Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 25, 2016 Share #41 Posted November 25, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Probably a Fuji GFX. I don't do ugly cameras Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/266766-noctilux-for-the-s007/?do=findComment&comment=3155355'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 25, 2016 Posted November 25, 2016 Hi Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS, Take a look here Noctilux for the S007. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
xiaubauu2009 Posted November 25, 2016 Share #42 Posted November 25, 2016 I don't do ugly cameras Should really do one with the eye finder off.. Hahahah Anyway, This will definitely work compare to the S. Burnt too heavy by this system, 2 times out of the S and left with a bitter taste in my mouth... Worse camera system I have the unfortunate opportunity to own... and I have owned quite a bit... I am now left with Sigma... and Alpa Phase Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted November 25, 2016 Share #43 Posted November 25, 2016 If you want to buy my S system, give me a shout................I'm planning to sell the S system and buy a M240 with 1/2 a dozen M lenses, and live miserably ever after :) Just ship it to me and I'll relieve you of all stress over weight, repairs, delays, etc. And I'll send you a free book. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 25, 2016 Share #44 Posted November 25, 2016 Just ship it to me and I'll relieve you of all stress over weight, repairs, delays, etc. And I'll send you a free book. Jeff The last bloke gave me a book and a thumb drive :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2wk Posted November 25, 2016 Share #45 Posted November 25, 2016 Neil I feel your Leica service pain. My original MM had so many problems that required soo many trips from California to New Jersey. This was my first digital Leica and it was a shocking experience after all the hard earned cash I laid out for the thing. My second digital Leica was a X Vario I won in a photo contest. It just up and died on me (a few months out of warranty). It has been in New Jersey for at least 6 months now and they don't even bother returning my calls or emails. ' I had lusted after an S for years and when I finally had the $ saved up I was looking to possibly buy a used 006. I thought about it long and hard. I ended up buying a Pentax 645z. It is quite ugly. But you know what....that thing just works. I haven't had one problem with it. It always keeps the sensor nice and clean. I can adjust the autofocus of each lens through the camera menu! That would have required month long trips for an S. The pentax lenses are cheap and good. I just made a 160cm x 100cm print that is absolutely mind blowing. For me, Leica will always be about my M6 and 50 lux. A beautiful finely crafted instrument that works and works and works. Digital red dots? No thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted November 25, 2016 Share #46 Posted November 25, 2016 David When I had the Noctilux and used it on a 240 it was my go to lens, I used it for everything, including long exposures, Panoramas and head jobs. Just because it had a aperture of 0.95 didn't mean to say that it had to be shot at 0.95. I just liked the rendering of the lens and most of the time didn't shoot it fully open. Fred, I do understand what you are saying regarding not using a Noctilux wide open on an M. Leica loaned me a demo current one and an M for when I dropped mine. I tried it wide open of course and a couple of days walk around but actually used it mainly stopped down in a studio. For me, where I didn't need the fastest apertures for my style, I found it heavier and larger than I like and at comparable apertures I didn't notice any difference in comparison to mr Summilux. I can only imagine that the same situation would be scaled up with a hypothetical Noctilux S 70, which was the thrust of my comment in my first reply. If Leica Canera were to make such a lens I think it would perforce be huge and hugely expensive......and people would buy them! I really do think that the Summicron S 100 embodies almost exactly what you value though Cheers Not David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted November 26, 2016 Share #47 Posted November 26, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) If Leica made a 63mm f1.4, which is a 50mm f1.1 in 35mm terms, and made one with an AF motor that didn't break, I would buy a Leica S. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 26, 2016 Share #48 Posted November 26, 2016 If Leica made a 63mm f1.4, which is a 50mm f1.1 in 35mm terms, and made one with an AF motor that didn't break, I would buy a Leica S. Dont it will break Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted November 27, 2016 Share #49 Posted November 27, 2016 Only if you buy one perhaps Neil Haven't broken my 70 or 120 yet with 30,000 plus exposures thus far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 27, 2016 Share #50 Posted November 27, 2016 Only if you buy one perhaps Neil Haven't broken my 70 or 120 yet with 30,000 plus exposures thus far. You know its just around the corner :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Barnack Posted November 27, 2016 Share #51 Posted November 27, 2016 Given the price of the ASPH 0.95 Noctilux M, I shudder to think what the price of an ASPH 0.95 Noctilux S would be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 27, 2016 Share #52 Posted November 27, 2016 Given the price of the ASPH 0.95 Noctilux M, I shudder to think what the price of an ASPH 0.95 Noctilux S would be. Probably a wee bitty more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted November 27, 2016 Share #53 Posted November 27, 2016 A very high price would be a given but 0.95 wouldn't be necessary. A Summilux-S would give the same sort of look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 27, 2016 Share #54 Posted November 27, 2016 Paul I think the 120 is a sumerlux Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted November 27, 2016 Share #55 Posted November 27, 2016 Paul I think the 120 is a sumerlux Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Even spell check won't help your understanding.... it's a Summarit (f2.5), not a Summilux (f1.4) Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 27, 2016 Share #56 Posted November 27, 2016 Even spell check won't help your understanding.... it's a Summarit (f2.5), not a Summilux (f1.4) Jeff Cheers Pal Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted November 27, 2016 Share #57 Posted November 27, 2016 There's a reason the fastest S lens is a Summicron (f2). Cheers, bud. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted November 27, 2016 Share #58 Posted November 27, 2016 There's a reason the fastest S lens is a Summicron (f2). Cheers, bud. Jeff whys that?? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted November 28, 2016 Share #59 Posted November 28, 2016 Suggest you research medium format vs 35mm lenses, not just Leica. Then add to that Leica's emphasis on S lens quality, not size. And include AF in that equation. You think you have issues with S system size and weight now? On top of that, if you're really serious about the notion of an S Noctilux, consider the build difficulty for the 50mm-M Noctilux f0.95 (LFI has an article from February, 2010 that will enlighten.) Translate that to the S. Then consider price and market demand. But then I guess there's a buyer for just about anything in Leica-world (or Neil-world). Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted November 28, 2016 Share #60 Posted November 28, 2016 I can't image a Noctilux-S, in the truest sense of f0.95 - f1.2, is is ever going to happen. But a summilux may possibly happen and it will give the same sort of look. I think the only real prohibitive factor is market demand, something only Leica can fully say. I can't imagine there are going to be a lot of S cameras sold because of the problems which continue to be unresolved and for what other systems are available in this day and age. I have considered, very closely, the S, I like the images it puts out. But there is no reason for me to go there when there are systems on offer with great reliability, a set of specs that I need now (not in the hope they makes something in the future) and have greater potential to be around for at least another decade. It does not seem like a safe or wise investment at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.