Vieri Posted September 11, 2016 Share #1 Posted September 11, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) After reviewing it on the Leica SL with the S-Adapter L, I reviewed the Super-Elmar-S 24mm f/3.5 on the Leica S (Typ 007) as well. You can see the article here: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-f3-5-review-on-the-leica-s-typ-007.html Enjoy! Best, Vieri Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 11, 2016 Posted September 11, 2016 Hi Vieri, Take a look here Leica Super-Elmar-S 24mm reviewed on the Leica S (Typ 007). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
leicapages Posted September 11, 2016 Share #2 Posted September 11, 2016 After reviewing it on the Leica SL with the S-Adapter L, I reviewed the Super-Elmar-S 24mm f/3.5 on the Leica S (Typ 007) as well. You can see the article here: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-f3-5-review-on-the-leica-s-typ-007.html Enjoy! Best, Vieri well done Vieri, thank you. My widest lens is the 30mm end of the Vario 30-90 but I am almost tempted when I read your review. Does the difference of 24mm vs 30mm make a huge difference when working landscapes (measured against the pain of having to change lenses in the field)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted September 11, 2016 Author Share #3 Posted September 11, 2016 well done Vieri, thank you. My widest lens is the 30mm end of the Vario 30-90 but I am almost tempted when I read your review. Does the difference of 24mm vs 30mm make a huge difference when working landscapes (measured against the pain of having to change lenses in the field)? Thank you Pascal, I am glad you enjoyed the read About your question, I think that there is a sizeable difference if field of view between a 24mm and a 19mm FOV equivalent (in terms of 35mm). In terms of angle of view, it is about 84' for the 30mm vs 96-97' for the 24mm, which is not a small difference. However, it all boils down to how much you like wide-angle landscapes: I love working with WA and ultra-WA, but your style might be different. Best, Vieri Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xiaubauu2009 Posted September 12, 2016 Share #4 Posted September 12, 2016 well done Vieri, thank you. My widest lens is the 30mm end of the Vario 30-90 but I am almost tempted when I read your review. Does the difference of 24mm vs 30mm make a huge difference when working landscapes (measured against the pain of having to change lenses in the field)? Definitely, the 24mm is like almost 18mm (or 19mm) vs a 24mm, the difference is quite big! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylgo Posted September 12, 2016 Share #5 Posted September 12, 2016 well done Vieri, thank you. My widest lens is the 30mm end of the Vario 30-90 but I am almost tempted when I read your review. Does the difference of 24mm vs 30mm make a huge difference when working landscapes (measured against the pain of having to change lenses in the field)? Hi Pascal, There is also a difference in image quality, the 24mm is outstanding. otoh I am inclined to carry one lens (weight pain, lens change pain)and stitch two images together, this will increase the angle of coverage if not the exact same look of the wider 24mm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertknappmd Posted September 12, 2016 Share #6 Posted September 12, 2016 I have the 24mm and it is amazing. It is the equivalent of a 19mm lens (35mm format) and the optics are flawless. Zero distortion and MTF charts are stunning. One of my favorites.. The photo you see is from Olympic national park in Washington and the moss covered trees are actually five or six feet in front of me.. Albert Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/264414-leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-reviewed-on-the-leica-s-typ-007/?do=findComment&comment=3111108'>More sharing options...
albertknappmd Posted September 12, 2016 Share #7 Posted September 12, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) another example... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/264414-leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-reviewed-on-the-leica-s-typ-007/?do=findComment&comment=3111111'>More sharing options...
mgrayson3 Posted September 12, 2016 Share #8 Posted September 12, 2016 I'm very much a FF 28mm FoV shooter, so the S 35/2.5 is perfect for me, but I LOVED the S 24/3.5 for the two weeks I had one, and I'm not sure I can live without it now. I hope they show up on the used market soon.... --Matt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McMaster Posted September 12, 2016 Share #9 Posted September 12, 2016 Why would anyone sell theirs ;-) john Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgrayson3 Posted September 12, 2016 Share #10 Posted September 12, 2016 A fellow can dream, can't he? But people do give up on the system from time to time. I paid about half list price for my 35, 70, and 120. I can wait. Maybe... --Matt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McMaster Posted September 12, 2016 Share #11 Posted September 12, 2016 So did I, but my 45mm and zoom both had to come new :-( That was a while ago though... john Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darylgo Posted September 12, 2016 Share #12 Posted September 12, 2016 A fellow can dream, can't he? But people do give up on the system from time to time. I paid about half list price for my 35, 70, and 120. I can wait. Maybe... --Matt The Leica Stores have Q stock, the price is reduced from list. My copy was listed as Q but shows no signs of use, it was also the display. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan.y Posted September 22, 2016 Share #13 Posted September 22, 2016 The review is now offline. How come? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photoskeptic Posted September 23, 2016 Share #14 Posted September 23, 2016 I have the 24mm and it is amazing. It is the equivalent of a 19mm lens (35mm format) and the optics are flawless. Zero distortion and MTF charts are stunning. One of my favorites.. The photo you see is from Olympic national park in Washington and the moss covered trees are actually five or six feet in front of me.. Albert Well, hell, it should be at $10K!! Wouldn't mind having one at half the price Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #15 Posted September 23, 2016 The review is now offline. How come? Hello Alan, the review is still online of course. You can find it here: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-vs-leica-vario-elmarit-sl-review.html All the best, Vieri Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share #16 Posted September 23, 2016 Well, hell, it should be at $10K!! Wouldn't mind having one at half the price It's not impossible, with a little patience - I found mine at a little over 3.000 euro in perfect conditions Best, Vieri Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertknappmd Posted September 23, 2016 Share #17 Posted September 23, 2016 Well, hell, it should be at $10K!! Wouldn't mind having one at half the price Doubt it as the lens is so exceptional... Save your kopeks! Albert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan.y Posted September 24, 2016 Share #18 Posted September 24, 2016 Hello Alan, the review is still online of course. You can find it here: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-vs-leica-vario-elmarit-sl-review.html All the best, Vieri Hi Vieri, I was referring to your review of the lens on the S 007. That page remains blank: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-f3-5-review-on-the-leica-s-typ-007.html Alan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieri Posted September 24, 2016 Author Share #19 Posted September 24, 2016 Hi Vieri, I was referring to your review of the lens on the S 007. That page remains blank: https://vieribottazzini.com/2016/09/leica-super-elmar-s-24mm-f3-5-review-on-the-leica-s-typ-007.html Alan Hi Alan, sorry for the wrong link, I am on the road now, on the Asturian coasts of Spain, and I copied the wrong like for you - however, even with the slowish connections here I can access the right link you posted here just fine. Can you please send me a message from my website (not to pollute the forum with that) and elaborate on the error you get? Thanks! Best, Vieri Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.