a911s Posted May 26, 2016 Share #41  Posted May 26, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thanks Dirk, I get this quite often with the 90mm AA, sometimes in unexpected circumstances. The sun can be above or behind, but if the background is strongly lit in comparison to the subject it is quite common. I do not know if it would be significantly better with a larger hood (I am using the built-in one) or without a filter. Probably should experiment.  The 90mm AA flares with a filter - try removing it.  I use small aftermarket hoods on most of my Leica M lenses - for protection more than anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 26, 2016 Posted May 26, 2016 Hi a911s, Take a look here Why use a hood on a Leica lens?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Echo63 Posted May 26, 2016 Share #42  Posted May 26, 2016 I use hoods, for both mechanical and photonic protection.  My 50 summarit has a cheap ebay screw in hood - conveniently it is threaded 52mm, so i have blanked off the vents with cinefoil and gaffa tape, to use it with filters (and a lenscap) too  90mm rokkor has the original rubber hood.  My work Canon lenses all have hoods. They get reversed for storage in the bag, extended when the lenses come out of the bag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB23 Posted May 26, 2016 Share #43 Â Posted May 26, 2016 No lens hood will negate contre-jour effects Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelwj Posted May 26, 2016 Share #44 Â Posted May 26, 2016 No lens hood will negate contre-jour effects The lens cap works a treat in those situations - completely eliminates and contre-jour effect Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted May 26, 2016 Share #45  Posted May 26, 2016 No lens hood will negate contre-jour effects  Nor is that their purpose.  Pip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB23 Posted May 27, 2016 Share #46 Â Posted May 27, 2016 Nor is that their purpose. Â Pip. I was responding to a contrejour photograph with some veil in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted May 27, 2016 Share #47 Â Posted May 27, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) Ah. OK. Â Depending on one's specific and personal interpretation of the term 'contre-jour' a hood will have different degrees of success. Â Some hold that the true definition must include only those images where the principle light source would be visible within the image area were it (the PLS) not blocked from view by an element within that same image area. Others merely require the camera to be pointing (and I quote) "more or less in the direction of the principal light source" to qualify as being considered contre-jour. Â In the first example the use of a hood, it goes without saying, is impossible. In the second example a hood could make all the difference in the world. Â It would be useful to know to which image you were responding, NB23. Â Pip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.