Jump to content

Classic M or M246?


Deliberate1

Recommended Posts

The M246 is better for me, not that I found the MM bad in any way.

 

But the Live View and ability to use a vast number of lenses that were previously restricted makes the difference. Yes the viewfinder is better, but irrelevant really. The wider DR solves the biggest concern with the MM and if blown highlights do occur they aren't as harsh with the M246. The increase in ISO is also very good. I often used the MM at high ISO because of the inherent grainy quality of the image, the M246 is however like using a fine grain film at equivalent high ISO's (say 5000) and goes on to become grainy much higher up the range. But all these thing depend on how you use the camera, or how you would like to use the camera if you could. I often have my M246 on a tripod contemplating the situation, hence Live View is perfect, I did want to reliably go up the focal length range without going stupid, so perfect focus every time is now possible with a 135mm. And I can buy any other good 35mm lens (and there are many that are as good as a Leica lens) at prices far cheaper than a Leica equivalent, so less hand wringing if an experimental focal length goes wrong. 

 

Also having owned both an M240 and MM at the same time I never found a conflict in 'the platform' because I never used them both at the same time, I decided what I was doing before leaving home. So an M9 and M246 could work the same way.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the MM, and now have the MM246.

 

The shutter's noise and feeling is much nicer, something that I appreciate a lot.

The optical viewfinder is better too.

The LCD screen has a higher resolution and is bigger.

Having liveview is great. And I like the possibility of making nice B/W movie clips.

The 246's buffer is much faster.

 

It is overall a better camera...   and there is no risk of sensor corrosion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

FWIW - I had a M9 with a bad sensor sitting in the Leica service department in NJ. I took advantage of the upgrade offer and purchased the MP 240. Shortly after that the MM was offered through a dealer with a full warranty with a $3000.00+ discount. I had the extra batteries and accessories for the M9 that I had not sold off and decided to go for the Monochrom. I am quite happy with both cameras and do not find any problems switching between the two of them. The 246 would have been nice but the extra cost was prohibitive for me after spending for the MP 240 upgrade.

 

I would have been happy to keep my M9 but after two separate trips for service and out of my hands for a few months on both occasions I felt it was best to move on.

 

Hopefully you have made a decision by know and you are enjoying a ..........?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I bought an M8 for dipping my toes and unavoidable color work and lacked the patience to wait for the 246 release i.e. bought an pre-owned Monochrom towards the end of it's product cycle.

I think the M246 would be nice to have, but I'll wait till the 3rd model is out. - Monochroms are technologically outdated at their release, so why rush things?

FTR: I resisted the urge to grab a 2nd body right now after figuring out that I'll want higher ISO at least in one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...