JamesBarry Posted April 12, 2017 Share #201 Posted April 12, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) 50 Lux @1.4 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/238441-in-defence-of-the-ccd-sensor-in-the-leica-m-cameras/?do=findComment&comment=3253443'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 12, 2017 Posted April 12, 2017 Hi JamesBarry, Take a look here In defence of the CCD sensor in the Leica M Cameras. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
fsprow Posted April 12, 2017 Share #202 Posted April 12, 2017 In my opinion, the trade off is a little more PP using the CMOS sensors versus the much higher ISO achievable with CMOS versus CCD. For me, the balance lies with the CMOS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ko.Fe. Posted April 12, 2017 Share #203 Posted April 12, 2017 This thread is about defence. You can't PP it to get something which exist in oily CCD files, but absent in pixelated CMOS files. I could balance low CCD ISO with low light by TTL flash. Just like Garry Winogrand and Bruce Gilden used flash and film Leica cameras. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fsprow Posted April 12, 2017 Share #204 Posted April 12, 2017 I would say the difference between a flash exposure and one taken at a higher iso with no flash is much greater than the CCD/CMOS difference. I and my clients have never noticed the highly pixelated CMOS phenomenon you refer to. But, as they say, whatever floats your boat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ko.Fe. Posted April 13, 2017 Share #205 Posted April 13, 2017 Yep, my boat floats on knowledge of balancing flash and ambient light, which comes after no flash experience. To be honest, pixelation is only visible on 100% crop. Clients and those who are serving them usually not into it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beena22 Posted April 14, 2017 Share #206 Posted April 14, 2017 Zeiss Planar @F2 Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colint544 Posted April 14, 2017 Share #207 Posted April 14, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! I've had my M Monochrom mk1 since August 2012. I use it a lot, and I now can't imagine being without it. I take the fabulous quality of the files as a given. I rarely go above 2500 ISO. I know the M246 Monochrom goes a lot higher in ISO, and I can only imagine what the M10 Monochrom will be capable of. ISO just keeps going higher and higher as the years pass. I've no experience of the M246, but I love the grain my M Monochrom mk1 produces at around 1600 ISO. It's all the camera I need. Attached shot was taken in Barmulloch, Glasgow, with the 35mm Summilux ASPH FLE. Cheers! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! I've had my M Monochrom mk1 since August 2012. I use it a lot, and I now can't imagine being without it. I take the fabulous quality of the files as a given. I rarely go above 2500 ISO. I know the M246 Monochrom goes a lot higher in ISO, and I can only imagine what the M10 Monochrom will be capable of. ISO just keeps going higher and higher as the years pass. I've no experience of the M246, but I love the grain my M Monochrom mk1 produces at around 1600 ISO. It's all the camera I need. Attached shot was taken in Barmulloch, Glasgow, with the 35mm Summilux ASPH FLE. Cheers! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/238441-in-defence-of-the-ccd-sensor-in-the-leica-m-cameras/?do=findComment&comment=3254534'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.