jip Posted May 16, 2014 Share #1 Posted May 16, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am wondering how Reciprocity failure works with very fast shutter speeds like the R8 with a 1/8000 shutter speed. Most film is rated accurate from 1/1000 to 1 second. How does this work with shutter speeds faster than 1/1000? Might using a ND filter be better than to use the very high speeds? Thanks!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 Hi jip, Take a look here Reciprocity failure with FAST shutter speeds.. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
fotohuis Posted May 16, 2014 Share #2 Posted May 16, 2014 Correct but the deviation is above 1/2000s and till 1/8000s it is not much. So I would bother more on the other end: > 1-2s. Or use the Fuji Acros 100 with a linear exposure till 120 seconds. With this modern film I would not do any reciproke correction between 1/8000s-120s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted May 16, 2014 Author Share #3 Posted May 16, 2014 Thanks for the quick response, film is still sort if new for me. I've developed black and white myself but I'm still learning. Like recently I read about the reciprocity failure. Then I though yes of course (remembering my chemistry class) but wasn't sure how it would deviate. Films I most use are TRI-X and Portra by Kodak. Would it be save to use the 1/8000 shutters speed with those films? Or anything shorter than 1/1000 at all? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted May 17, 2014 Share #4 Posted May 17, 2014 I often use 1/8000 on my R8. Mainly because I use a large aperture lens even during good light. Exposure has never been a problem because of the fast shutter speed. Use it with impunity. P.S. I use a whole range of films. No difference that I can detect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StS Posted May 17, 2014 Share #5 Posted May 17, 2014 (...)Films I most use are TRI-X and Portra by Kodak. Would it be save to use the 1/8000 shutters speed with those films? Or anything shorter than 1/1000 at all? Both films are very tolerant in my experience, especially Tri-X. If you look in the data sheet for Tri-X, the correction is half a stop (plus 15% development increase) for 1/10000 s but Kodak also mention, that Tri-X can be underexposed by one stop without correction. If you skip the increase of development time, you might even make life more easy for your film scanner. I wonder, how accurate the camera shutter actually is at 1/8000. If really in doubt, especially with slide film, you can run a test series with different aperture/shutter time combinations on the same strip - I doubt there will be a visible difference. Stefan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted May 17, 2014 Author Share #6 Posted May 17, 2014 Okay so basically just use it, and if I understand right the reciprocity failure is usually only noticed with long shutter speeds at night? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrisRose Posted May 17, 2014 Share #7 Posted May 17, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) That was actually a really interesting question - i knew about the problem at very low speeds, but i didn't even think about very high ones. Clearly i'm getting too used to shooting 1/4000 and 1/8000 on digital Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jip Posted May 17, 2014 Author Share #8 Posted May 17, 2014 I just read that most modern films say their accuracy is good between 1/10000 an 1 second so I can easily use the 1/8000 shutter. On the R8/9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted May 17, 2014 Share #9 Posted May 17, 2014 Automatic strobe flash units can quench the light burst to 1/50,000 or less, so you might search for effects of reciprocity with strobe use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.