Jump to content

Leica T and Hasselblad Lunar side-by-side compairson


Recommended Posts

24.3 vs 16.3 .... easy win. :)

 

Of course, a 50% increase in megapixels on tap means better print quallity. But doesn't the huge price difference make the increased imae quality seem like a situation of diminishing returns?

 

JMHO, but for the cost of the Lunar, it wouldn't take much more of an investment to get an M240...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the Lunar a bit ostentatious for my taste. I prefer the (relatively) quiet quality and understated nature of the T. I could easily imagine myself getting candids with the T, but with the Lunar I would likely be more worried about getting mugged than getting the shots. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the availability of the Sony A7, the only reason why anyone might consider buying the Hasselblad is as a tax dodge.

 

And there are more socially acceptable ways of avoiding tax than that, including breaking the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...