Herr Barnack Posted May 12, 2014 Share #1 Posted May 12, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Interesting compairson of Leica T vs. Hasselblad Lunar: Leica T vs. Hasselblad Lunar JMHO, but I see no reason to buy the Lunar over the T - particularly at almost $7000 USD. I can think of another $7000 USD digital camera that would make MUCH more sense... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 12, 2014 Posted May 12, 2014 Hi Herr Barnack, Take a look here Leica T and Hasselblad Lunar side-by-side compairson. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jmahto Posted May 12, 2014 Share #2 Posted May 12, 2014 24.3 vs 16.3 .... easy win. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
viramati Posted May 12, 2014 Share #3 Posted May 12, 2014 (edited) I believe the lunar is just a Sony Nex-7 in some sort of strange makeup, a bit like the rebadged D-lux series of Pano/leica cameras so it really isn't unique which the T is. Edited May 12, 2014 by viramati 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Barnack Posted May 12, 2014 Author Share #4 Posted May 12, 2014 (edited) 24.3 vs 16.3 .... easy win. Of course, a 50% increase in megapixels on tap means better print quallity. But doesn't the huge price difference make the increased imae quality seem like a situation of diminishing returns? JMHO, but for the cost of the Lunar, it wouldn't take much more of an investment to get an M240... Edited May 12, 2014 by Carlos Danger Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelbrenner Posted May 12, 2014 Share #5 Posted May 12, 2014 I find the Lunar a bit ostentatious for my taste. I prefer the (relatively) quiet quality and understated nature of the T. I could easily imagine myself getting candids with the T, but with the Lunar I would likely be more worried about getting mugged than getting the shots. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted May 13, 2014 Share #6 Posted May 13, 2014 Given the availability of the Sony A7, the only reason why anyone might consider buying the Hasselblad is as a tax dodge. And there are more socially acceptable ways of avoiding tax than that, including breaking the law. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.