Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Share #1 Posted April 26, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Most sites are talking about the two lenses offered at release - the 2/23 Summicron T, and the 3.5~5.6/18-56 Vario-Elmar T. But looking on Lavidaleica's review page, I was surprised to see the photos and specs for two more lenses - 3.5~5.6/55-135 APO Vario-Elmar T 3.5~4.5/11-23 Super Vario-Elmar T I think its interesting that three of the first four lenses offered are zooms, and a complement of all three of those will cover the gambit from 17mm-200mm (full frame equivalent). I'm intrigued that that is their initial focus, rather than, say, 28mm or 21mm, 50mm and 90mm equivalents first. It shows just how much of a break from the M and S mould this T system is aimed to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 26, 2014 Posted April 26, 2014 Hi Winedemonium, Take a look here 3 zooms to cover the traditional DSLR range . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
satijntje Posted April 26, 2014 Share #2 Posted April 26, 2014 The t-summicron is 23mm (35mm ff eq)! John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Author Share #3 Posted April 26, 2014 The t-summicron is 23mm (35mm ff eq)! John Thanks. Corrected now. In my head it is 2/35 already converted, as that is such a classic - I neglected to convert back to its correct designation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted April 26, 2014 Share #4 Posted April 26, 2014 I think it's clear that this camera is designed to appeal to a largely different audience from the M's traditional buyers, and I agree that the zooms are further evidence of this. Reading the media sites, the camera is coming in for a fair amount of ridicule for what is perceived as derivative styling, low specs and absurdly high price compared with the Japanese competition, but it also has a fair number of defenders, largely aspirational in the sense that it seems to come mostly from people saying "I'd buy one if I could afford one, which I can't" . The consensus (not that it matters) seems to be that it's a trap for the wealthy hipsters rather than photographers, though I interpret the web's idea of "photographer" as "camera geek". In this respect at least, it is very similar to the M! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Author Share #5 Posted April 26, 2014 but it also has a fair number of defenders, largely aspirational I imagine this camera is going to do very well in key Asian markets on the basis of brand value, Apple-like styling, and ease of use. The camera's aesthetics in particular I think are going to appeal a great deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.