Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted April 26, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Most sites are talking about the two lenses offered at release - the 2/23 Summicron T, and the 3.5~5.6/18-56 Vario-Elmar T. Â But looking on Lavidaleica's review page, I was surprised to see the photos and specs for two more lenses - 3.5~5.6/55-135 APO Vario-Elmar T 3.5~4.5/11-23 Super Vario-Elmar T Â I think its interesting that three of the first four lenses offered are zooms, and a complement of all three of those will cover the gambit from 17mm-200mm (full frame equivalent). Â I'm intrigued that that is their initial focus, rather than, say, 28mm or 21mm, 50mm and 90mm equivalents first. It shows just how much of a break from the M and S mould this T system is aimed to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 26, 2014 Posted April 26, 2014 Hi Winedemonium, Take a look here 3 zooms to cover the traditional DSLR range. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
satijntje Posted April 26, 2014 Share #2 Â Posted April 26, 2014 The t-summicron is 23mm (35mm ff eq)! Â John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Author Share #3  Posted April 26, 2014 The t-summicron is 23mm (35mm ff eq)! John  Thanks. Corrected now. In my head it is 2/35 already converted, as that is such a classic - I neglected to convert back to its correct designation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted April 26, 2014 Share #4 Â Posted April 26, 2014 I think it's clear that this camera is designed to appeal to a largely different audience from the M's traditional buyers, and I agree that the zooms are further evidence of this. Â Reading the media sites, the camera is coming in for a fair amount of ridicule for what is perceived as derivative styling, low specs and absurdly high price compared with the Japanese competition, but it also has a fair number of defenders, largely aspirational in the sense that it seems to come mostly from people saying "I'd buy one if I could afford one, which I can't" . The consensus (not that it matters) seems to be that it's a trap for the wealthy hipsters rather than photographers, though I interpret the web's idea of "photographer" as "camera geek". Â In this respect at least, it is very similar to the M! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winedemonium Posted April 26, 2014 Author Share #5  Posted April 26, 2014 but it also has a fair number of defenders, largely aspirational  I imagine this camera is going to do very well in key Asian markets on the basis of brand value, Apple-like styling, and ease of use. The camera's aesthetics in particular I think are going to appeal a great deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.