Jump to content

Would you upgrade to M(360) for $9000


dant

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Every increase in MP resolution, on every digital camera I have owned, has always resulted in better IQ, in both prints and elsewhere.

 

So I can't see any reason at all not to expect more MP in the next M, and in fact will not buy the next M unless it is ~ 36 MP or better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He had issues with the 90 AA, 100 Makro APO and I believe the 180 Elmarit APO handheld. None on a weighted tripod.

Matter of shooting technique? I cannot see any resolution loss on my 280 plus 1.4x extender when shot at reasonable shutterspeeds. At least nothing different from using film or an M8 with similat focal lengths. Of course one needs stuff like chest pod, beanbag etc - but that goes for any camera.

DL is known for reinventing the wheel on photography basics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point in digital photography more megapixels within a given format such as 24x36mm does not equate to higher quality, nor better resolution, or better anything.

 

It is better for digital enthusiasts to look forward to far superior monitors and printers that can exploit their dream megapixels.

 

Such monitors and printers do not exist today, and those of marginal requisites are so far from public affordability that they well as well not exist.

...

I agree, we have enough pixels. Now UltraHD 4k TVs are have hit the market and 8k are being prototyped, I look forward to photographic quality monitors with a decent colour gamut that can match the resolution of our camera sensors, preferably without taking up a whole wall (i.e, utilizing a higher density display) -- no more zooming in to 100% magnification or decontextualized pixel peeping.

 

For black and white viewing, proofing etc., I would like to have a 300 dpi e-ink display with 256 levels of grey with a decent contrast ratio and range of viewing angles.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the colour gamut is OK with high-end monitors rendering (nearly) full Adobe RGB. A finer pixel structure with the attendant higher resolution would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It is better for digital enthusiasts to look forward to far superior monitors and printers that can exploit their dream megapixels.

 

Such monitors and printers do not exist today, and those of marginal requisites are so far from public affordability that they well as well not exist.

 

I agree that it's all about the total workflow. Unfortunately, in the printer realm, Epson is now the gorilla and lacks sufficient competition to keep pushing print boundaries IMO. Their product release cycle seems to have slowed, and production of the 4900 was reportedly held up due to significant clog issues.

 

I'll add editing software to the chain, as every major iteration of LR, for instance (especially versions with new processing engine), improved my prints as much if not more than a lens or camera switch. Couple that with improved papers, and in some cases inks, and one doesn't need camera/lens 'upgrades' for continually improved print results.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...