Jump to content

Summilux or Noctilux


KAD

Recommended Posts

Guest Ansel_Adams

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The only reason people put up with the massive size of the Noctilux is to get its maximum aperture (f1.2, f1 or f0.95), which was handy in the film days for low light, particularly press photography. With digital you can easily increase ISO by one stop and you have the same range.

 

Unless that is your main usage then you don't need it. It is not a better lens than a summicorn or summilux at other stops - in fact it is worse. Nobody buys a Noctilux to shoot at f2!

 

In my book the Summicron is the best lens out there fore Leica, with the best price/performance/size ratio. You don't even need a Summilux.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is not a better lens than a summicorn or summilux at other stops - in fact it is worse.

 

Which one did you own? It sounds like you had a bad copy.

 

Nobody buys a Noctilux to shoot at f2!

 

I think you might find that everyone who buys a Noctilux intends to use it at all apertures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason people put up with the massive size of the Noctilux is to get its maximum aperture (f1.2, f1 or f0.95), which was handy in the film days for low light, particularly press photography. With digital you can easily increase ISO by one stop and you have the same range...........

 

...............................

 

I've explained why I didn't keep my Noctilux, it wasn"t right for me, but I get the impression (because people say it explicitly) that it's not just about the light-gathering powers of the f1± lenses but the extremely shallow dof they make possible. No iso settings can replicate this. Again, we don't all want this effect, but many do.

 

Anyway, some people enjoy the lens enormously, for whatever reasons. What's wrong with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ansel_Adams

I think you might find that everyone who buys a Noctilux intends to use it at all apertures.

 

Maybe, yes. But the Nocti has no ADVANTAGE at other apertures. In fact it can be worse. The only reason you get it over a Summilux is for f1. f0.95, etc.. You do not buy a Noctilux to shoot at f8, when a cheaper and smaller Leica lens can already do that, and probably better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact it can be worse

 

You didn't answer me and just stated the same nonsense. Which one did you own? The Noctilux 0.95 should be as sharp as the Summilux ASPH. It plays a neck and neck game through out the apertures, sometimes the same, sometimes slightly sharper, sometimes slightly not as sharp, but for all intents and puroses too close to state much of a difference. Like the Summilux, it is sharper than the Summicron at all apertures. Some more-so than others. The summicron, while old is still a very good design but the newer technology, designs and glass gets the edge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Which part insulted you? The fact that someone likes something you don't seem to? That someone doesn't agree with your sweeping assumptions and generalisations? Or the part that condenses the many reviews and tests over the net and personal experience?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Summilux asph = practical and almost boring

Noctilux = emotional and exciting, especially, the f/1 version

 

I have both but use the Nocti more often.

 

I will likely catch some flack for this:)!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...No one's gonna buy a noctilux for landscapes.

 

Yes Adrian, it's hard to shoot a good landscape with such a crap lens ;).

 

M9, 1.0/50 Noctilux E60 v3

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

It wouldn't be my choice for a landscape over the 1.4/50 Summilux ASPH but sometimes one just has to make do with what one has at hand :).

Oh, and they look great printed to A2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can get used to the size and weight, personally I don't even notice it, and if you forget about the stupid price and stop worrying about it, and that does happen after a while, then it's a very capable, flexible, every day, all rounder lens. It's my standard lens for work and personal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark what f stop were those nice landscapes at? I've seen them posted before on here, lovely.

 

Thanks a lot Adrian.

 

The Skillion was shot at about f8.0. The EXIF data of the seascape is f4.8 but that is way off as it was shot at approx. f1.4 with an ND filter - note the shallow DOF about the centre rock platform and the soft vignetted corners.

 

Regards,

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ansel_Adams
Yes Adrian, it's hard to shoot a good landscape with such a crap lens ;).

 

M9, 1.0/50 Noctilux E60 v3

 

 

[ATTACH]425550[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]425549[/ATTACH]

 

 

It wouldn't be my choice for a landscape over the 1.4/50 Summilux ASPH but sometimes one just has to make do with what one has at hand :).

Oh, and they look great printed to A2.

 

Yes I agree, and a summicron would have done just a good a job also, been lighter and cheaper! This just reinforces my argument that the only reason to get a Noctilux is if you need to shoot wide open at f1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a ship note for my Noctlilux today, so I will pick it up after work. Still have not decided 100%, but I guess it will be very dificult to return when I get it inside :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...