castelletta Posted April 15, 2007 Share #1 Posted April 15, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) I find the AWB function in camera very much improved with the last 1.102 firmware release. Do you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 15, 2007 Posted April 15, 2007 Hi castelletta, Take a look here M8 White Balance after 1.102. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
marmar Posted April 15, 2007 Share #2 Posted April 15, 2007 Into the past days also was noticeable to me. I always used the c1 M8 generic profile as reference. best regards mm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetccox Posted April 15, 2007 Share #3 Posted April 15, 2007 I see no change, and I don't think Leica avows to having made one. People were seeing changes before when they had downloaded the same upgrade that they had when 1.090 was removed (they still had 1.060). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosuna Posted April 15, 2007 Share #4 Posted April 15, 2007 Yes, I have the same experience. The noise at ISO 640 (DNG files) have improved too !!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shootist Posted April 15, 2007 Share #5 Posted April 15, 2007 Yes I think so also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted April 16, 2007 Share #6 Posted April 16, 2007 I'm still getting erratic AWB. In the same room with unchanging lighting conditions, color balance in some shots looks very blue and in others will be right on. I wasn't really expecting any change in this behavior as it was my understanding that this update did not address the AWB issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsmith Posted April 16, 2007 Share #7 Posted April 16, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) I find the AWB function in camera very much improved with the last 1.102 firmware release.Do you? No, no difference, it's still hit and miss depending on aperature, lens, and distance. Take a shot , move back a foot , the wb dramatically changes sometimes. My guess is that it's not going to be possible to get it the level that we're use to with Canons or Nikons. Since the jpgs are over compressed, forcing us to always shoot raw, I guess it really doesn't matter anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.