stray cat Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33721 Posted June 5, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Philip - very dramatic - lovely red of the fire against the blue of the sea and sky. Reminds me a bit of the "Wicker Man" film! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Hi stray cat, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Doc Henry Posted June 5, 2017 Author Share #33722 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Some b&w pictures now Régine, a winemaker of Champagne Cliquot Ponsardin the day she married her son Kodak TX400-Leica MP-50 Summilux Asph Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Rg Henry Edited June 5, 2017 by Doc Henry 12 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Rg Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289580'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 5, 2017 Author Share #33723 Posted June 5, 2017 The village of Goudargue , called the "Venice" of Ardèche (France) Kodak TX400-Leica MP-50 Summilux Asph Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Rg Henry 16 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Rg Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289583'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 5, 2017 Author Share #33724 Posted June 5, 2017 St Michel bay high tide Kodak TX400-MP-35 Lux Asph Coolscan V - no correction Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry 14 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289593'>More sharing options...
Popular Post Doc Henry Posted June 5, 2017 Author Popular Post Share #33725 Posted June 5, 2017 I made just a test with some rolls of Ilford Pan F 50 Isos Leica R4S-Summicron 50-Ilford PanF 50(dev Ilfosol S) French Alpes in the 1990's Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Regards Henry 22 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Regards Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289603'>More sharing options...
Popular Post honcho Posted June 5, 2017 Popular Post Share #33726 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Whitby Abbey and swift (not a bat!). Inspired home of Dracula and other assorted oddball creatures, occasionally. Agfa Isolette iii Solinar 75mm f3.5 Acros 100 in APH09 Backpacking & travel camera par excellence. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited June 5, 2017 by honcho 25 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289604'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 5, 2017 Author Share #33727 Posted June 5, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Whitby Abbey and swift (not a bat!). inspired home of Dracula and other assorted oddball creatures, occasionally. Agfa Iolette iii Solinar 75mm f3.5 Acros 100 in APH09 Backpacking & travel camera par excellence. Brr ... dramatic picture , really Dracula atmosphere , you're right Steve Thank you for posting Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntonioF Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33728 Posted June 5, 2017 A gelato place in my hometown by night. M6, 35/2 asph, Trix400. Ciao. Antonio. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntonioF Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33729 Posted June 5, 2017 I made just a test with some rolls of Ilford Pan F 50 Isos Leica R4S-Summicron 50-Ilford PanF 50(dev Ilfosol S) French Alpes in the 1990's Regards Henry I have a couple of rolls of Pan F that I want to test ( a 35mm and a 120mm). The problem is I am not sure what to use them for ... portraits, landscapes, long exposure ... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hiles Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33730 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Did I screw up when Micheal suggested I use 0 and 5 filters and I changed to 2 and 4???? My thinking was to try and get a little more detail with the 2 and not so much contrast using 4 Thanks Neil No screw-up at all. I start using a 0 and 5 filter and test using the 0 for the highlights, and the 5 for the blacks/shadows. If I don't get just what I want, I might swap the 0 filter for a 1, 1.5 etc. That will increase the contrast somewhat. The exposure should be the same as with the 0 filter. In fact, yesterday I printed a difficult negative and I ended up using a 3 and 5 filter (I am still not completely happy, but this was the right direction). My argument is for an orderly, step-by-step approach. So I start with the 0/5 combination, and if more adjustment is needed, I ask "What adjustment will go in my needed direction?" Increased contrast will come from some or all of 1) increasing the 5 filter time, 2) decreasing the 0 filter time, or 3) swapping out the 0 filter for something somewhat higher. I don't tinker with swapping the 5 filter. That is the basis for the next test/try - and one step at a time. Don't adjust two things at the same time - you don't know what element did what. If that is not what you want, take the same approach. I try to get my desired result by adjusting the 0/5 times. I swap out the 0 filter only if I still can't get my desired result. I am unalterably opposed to seat-of-the-pants and hope-for-the-best efforts. I try to learn reproducible facts - building poorly based opinion is a waste of time money, paper and chemicals. I don't purport to be a fine printer. I get a few great prints and some gawd-help-us duds. But as far as it goes I at least understand what I am doing. Edited June 5, 2017 by Michael Hiles 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tytan Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33731 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Tokyo M7 / 50 Summilux ASPH Edited June 5, 2017 by Tytan 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnuyork Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33732 Posted June 5, 2017 I'd love any feedback on these, which POVs are cool etc. The first two were with the Zeiss 53mm Biogon (big brother to the SWC lens, only much older). First is the Velvia 50 The Velvia! It pops more than the Ektar. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnuyork Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33733 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Very busy period and not shooting too much film. Today I developed some rolls of Fomapan100, nice film happy with the results. These shots on my Konica Hexar AF These are fantastic. Great B&W tonality with the right amount of contrast. My favorite are the last two. Edited June 5, 2017 by gnuyork 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33734 Posted June 5, 2017 Some b&w pictures now Régine, a winemaker of Champagne Cliquot Ponsardin the day she married her son Kodak TX400-Leica MP-50 Summilux Asph MarCelikodtx400138-2lufht+++1000.jpg Rg Henry I love this one, Henry. It has a timeless quality about it. Best, Wayne 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33735 Posted June 5, 2017 No screw-up at all. I start using a 0 and 5 filter and test using the 0 for the highlights, and the 5 for the blacks/shadows. If I don't get just what I want, I might swap the 0 filter for a 1, 1.5 etc. That will increase the contrast somewhat. The exposure should be the same as with the 0 filter. In fact, yesterday I printed a difficult negative and I ended up using a 3 and 5 filter (I am still not completely happy, but this was the right direction). My argument is for an orderly, step-by-step approach. So I start with the 0/5 combination, and if more adjustment is needed, I ask "What adjustment will go in my needed direction?" Increased contrast will come from some or all of 1) increasing the 5 filter time, 2) decreasing the 0 filter time, or 3) swapping out the 0 filter for something somewhat higher. I don't tinker with swapping the 5 filter. That is the basis for the next test/try - and one step at a time. Don't adjust two things at the same time - you don't know what element did what. If that is not what you want, take the same approach. I try to get my desired result by adjusting the 0/5 times. I swap out the 0 filter only if I still can't get my desired result. I am unalterably opposed to seat-of-the-pants and hope-for-the-best efforts. I try to learn reproducible facts - building poorly based opinion is a waste of time money, paper and chemicals. I don't purport to be a fine printer. I get a few great prints and some gawd-help-us duds. But as far as it goes I at least understand what I am doing. im with you Michael. I'm even righting stuff down (never don that shit before). Tonight I took another flower picture and developed that neg along with devolution of the other neg that hopefully will replace that first neg that was two stops under....... just eye balling the two new negs taken tonight look like they have loads of details. I guess the proof will be in the pudding after I run them through the darkroom. Pictures to follow Neil 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sparkassenkunde Posted June 5, 2017 Popular Post Share #33736 Posted June 5, 2017 Here comes one from the Berlin underground: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Minilux - Cinestill 800T 27 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Minilux - Cinestill 800T ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3289662'>More sharing options...
wattsy Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33737 Posted June 5, 2017 Régine, a winemaker of Champagne Cliquot Ponsardin the day she married her son Not sure we allow that kind of thing this side of the channel, Henry. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33738 Posted June 5, 2017 I have a new batch of developed films and scans to sort through. Early Purple Orchid on a verge at Martin Down, Hampshire last month. 29 Summaron-M and Portra 400. 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STK Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33739 Posted June 5, 2017 You know I have "critical" spirit,also in my job I show you here two pictures taken at the same time (similar shadows on the roof). . One of the picture is in digital (M8-50 Lux Asph) and one is in film (M7-35 Lux Asph) Look at the blue sky, stone color ,rose flowers , vivid green of grass trees (in background) and plants (in foreground) etc... Chenonceau Castle Castles Loire River Valley 2016 Image1chenfaceestkp400m7lfht+++950.jpg L1014588-2chenonccastM850LA htlufger+++950-20.jpg Kodak Portra 400 and 320 Isos in digit. Difference also , in the sharpness of lines immediatly visible At first glance , the two pictures are beautiful I admit with you But which is closest to reality ? that's the question I said "the closest" , not the "exact" reality > It is the eye that has the correctness. Enjoy the difference ! Best Henry Henry, both are beautiful pictures. I prefer the film one, the digital one is too clean. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STK Posted June 5, 2017 Share #33740 Posted June 5, 2017 I like very much these comparisons between film and digital. Not to say which one better, but to see the differencies and character attributes of both. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now