Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34781 Posted June 19, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) A few more Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3298549'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 19, 2017 Posted June 19, 2017 Hi Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34782 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) Lovely Neil, 2 frames stitched, or more? Loving your landscapes. Gary I agree with Gary, superb landscape Neil A little blur in background, this picture is in full nuance Very pleasant and charming picture Beautiful and relaxing color Best Henry Edited June 19, 2017 by Doc Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34783 Posted June 19, 2017 more Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 6 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3298552'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34784 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) Currently doing my best to catch up on 130 unscanned rolls and deep into the b&w part of the rather impressive pile. Two 'forestscapes' from near Detmold in Germany. I'm a bit annoyed that I didn't get sunstars on the second one. M4 50/2 Kodak Double-X in Diafine (EI200) Flickr Flickr Really nice trees and leaves seen from this angle (picture 1) with great nuance in grey tone , Philip Nice second picture with the contre-jour If you have more please post Thank you Henry Edited June 19, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34785 Posted June 19, 2017 Melbourne Museum 170410_1_M5_0007.jpg M5, 35, Foma 400, svn Rgds C. Love this one, Christoph. Looks like a much shorter focal length than 35. Reminds of of the famous Muhammad Ali photo of his large fist in the foreground and the rest of his body in the background in bokeh I think this reptile could have given Ali a run for his money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34786 Posted June 19, 2017 I finally shot one roll of Ilford PanF and I did it at the beach. I really like the results and the 50s look of the tones. I need to buy a few more rolls! Here's one of the photos. The sub came out of the water with a big conger and people gathered around. I didn't photograph the fish, I liked the group of people more. No Leica at the beach: Nikon F (1969) - Nikkor 50/1.4 - PanF Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Antonio nice black and grey tone with Ilford PanF It looks like Kodak TMAX Best Henry 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34787 Posted June 19, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) A few more more Nice and natural grain Neil Is it Kodak TX ? Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34788 Posted June 19, 2017 Nice and natural grain Neil Is it Kodak TX ? Henry Yes Sir TX 400 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34789 Posted June 19, 2017 M3, 90 Collapsible Elmar, Ektar 100 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 13 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3298571'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34790 Posted June 19, 2017 M3, 90 Collapsible Elmar, Ektar 100 image122983b-2.JPG Sublime Wayne Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34791 Posted June 19, 2017 Apart from that building in the background (then again this was shot at a playground in town), this is the look I had hoped for in the previous photo. Plus another, more misty photo, also from a playground. M4 50/2 (11817) 5222 EI400 Diafine Flickr Flickr 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34792 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) Apart from that building in the background (then again this was shot at a playground in town), this is the look I had hoped for in the previous photo. Plus another, more misty photo, also from a playground. M4 50/2 (11817) 5222 EI400 Diafine Flickr Flickr Philip , film gives better nuance than digital because he has great dynamic like you can see in your 2 pictures posted here The gray or black scale in example is outstanding with great details in the shadows ! Superb contre-jour. Sun rays are great and also great relief Thank you Best Henry Edited June 19, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34793 Posted June 19, 2017 Another contre-jour for Henry. From one of last month's rolls. Near Roydon. Kodak Portra 400 and Summaron. 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34794 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) Another contre-jour for Henry. From one of last month's rolls. Near Roydon. Kodak Portra 400 and Summaron. Ian thank you I am happy today with your picture and Philip's pictures , both in "contre-jour" Really the color in film keeps the natural side and like in your picture Ian , the color and details are still superb in the shadows . I like much beige (at right) and yellow spots (at left) of flowers in foreground. Thank you again Ian and Philip Best Henry Edited June 19, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
honcho Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34795 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) more You're doing something wrong. Take a look at the tonal range in Phillipus's images in #34827 compared to yours. They are chalk and cheese. A lot of your images look tonally weird, in many cases it's down to what you are doing to the files after you have scanned the neg (your black and white tea plantation images were badly mangled in pp, as is the colour image you uploaded before these). I think you need to look at what you are doing. Let's backtrack: What film & developer have you used here? Edited June 19, 2017 by honcho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34796 Posted June 19, 2017 I have one roll of Kodak TX not finished yet and just developed yesterday , with Sylvain's wedding, so I post only now some pictures taken in Paris with MP camera Pigalle Paris May 2017 From Mc Do to Cinesex Atlas , just one step Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Bar terrasse "à la Parisienne" some reflection Leica MP-Kodak TX400-Summicron 35 Asph Nikon Coolscan 5000- Any correction Cloudy weather Kodak TX developed in Pure Professional Kodak D76 (6 mn 45sec at 20-22°c) Best Henry 11 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Bar terrasse "à la Parisienne" some reflection Leica MP-Kodak TX400-Summicron 35 Asph Nikon Coolscan 5000- Any correction Cloudy weather Kodak TX developed in Pure Professional Kodak D76 (6 mn 45sec at 20-22°c) Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3298673'>More sharing options...
Michael Geschlecht Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34797 Posted June 19, 2017 Melbourne Museum 170410_1_M5_0007.jpg M5, 35, Foma 400, svn Rgds C. Hello Chris, Nice photo. Who is this person? Best Regards, Michael 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tytan Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34798 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) M6TTL + 50 Summilux BP Pre-ASPH CineStill 50D Edited June 19, 2017 by Tytan 13 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted June 19, 2017 Share #34799 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) You're doing something wrong. Take a look at the tonal range in Phillipus's images in #34827 compared to yours. They are chalk and cheese. A lot of your images look tonally weird, in many cases it's down to what you are doing to the files after you have scanned the neg (your black and white tea plantation images were badly mangled in pp, as is the colour image you uploaded before these). I think you need to look at what you are doing. Let's backtrack: What film & developer have you used here? On another subject, but pertaining to correct exposure: I spent a few hours looking at "400 Photographs, Ansel Adams" on Father's Day (U.S.). I do not know why, but for some reason, I had never really appreciated the brilliance of the man's photographs as I did when I reviewed them this time. I am not sure if having taken so many B&W photographs myself, I now have a better reference to fully appreciate the magnitude of the man's talent, or, if it is something else. At any rate, this time around, it hit me in the face........like a brick. The book does not give information on equipment used for specific photographs, but it is my understanding he did virtually all of his work with large format and Hasselblad, MF gear. I am curious, and ask those more knowledgeable than myself: framing aside, is the brilliance of the man's work more an attribute of exposure?, or, format? Is the same gravity of result possible with 135 film? Please excuse such a novice question, but I was floored. I have never, personally, viewed an actual Adams print. I suppose the experience would be even more dramatic. I am now going to make it a point to see one. I guess another factor to be considered, the photos printed in the book, although reproductions, presented no digital, interpretive barrier between the viewer and the original photographs. Edited June 19, 2017 by Wayne 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share #34800 Posted June 19, 2017 June 8 NYC sunset - 3 of 5 (about 5-8 minutes after the last I posted and at peak intensity) SWC, Ektar NYC Sunset 3 of 5.jpg What beautiful palette of color Adam This picture is a nice painting , wonderful color with great nuance Not sure you obtain this natural palette color with digital Must be done for comparison , I am curious to know Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now