Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32001 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) New York City M-A, 28mm elmarit pre asph, Portra 400 Adam very nice color Portra 400 needs sun and much light and when you have light , color is really nice and vivid Do you agree with me ? Thanks for posting Regards Henry Edited May 5, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Hi Doc Henry, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
A miller Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32002 Posted May 5, 2017 Adam very nice color Portra 400 needs sun and much light and when you have light , color is really nice and vivid Do you agree with me ? Thanks for posting Regards Henry Thanks, Henry. I agree. It is very hard to overexpose this film. And it handles highlights extremely well 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32003 Posted May 5, 2017 Before moving on to some more wildlife, a sunset from Kilimanjaro. Flickr 1N 200/2.8L Velvia 50 16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32004 Posted May 5, 2017 Edward I just scan this picture taken in Bangkok (rare picture) If i find more I'll post here for you Bangkok in the 1990's Edward , less traffic at this time I like these tuk tuk ,we are sitting behind, we see the back of the driver and he is also our air bag . In Laos you have same tuk tuk Leica R4S-Summicron 50-Fuji Superia 100 Image5bkkfujisuplfht+++-950.jpg Rg Henry Please do Henry! I don't recognize the area where you took this photo but I'm sure it has changed completely nowadays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32005 Posted May 5, 2017 Before moving on to some more wildlife, a sunset from Kilimanjaro. Flickr 1N 200/2.8L Velvia 50 Fabulous! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobitybob Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32006 Posted May 5, 2017 Hiding in the trees ..... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Fuji GA645Zi, Lomography Colour 400 9 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Fuji GA645Zi, Lomography Colour 400 ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3268985'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32007 Posted May 5, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Edward I just scan this picture taken in Bangkok (rare picture) If i find more I'll post here for you Bangkok in the 1990's Edward , less traffic at this time I like these tuk tuk ,we are sitting behind, we see the back of the driver and he is also our air bag . In Laos you have same tuk tuk Leica R4S-Summicron 50-Fuji Superia 100 Image5bkkfujisuplfht+++-950.jpg Rg Henry and traffic in Laos .... in 2005 Fuji Superia 100-Leica R4S-Summicron 50 Road traffic Vientiane very quiet Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Funeral monument . Edward is it correct ? Taken in a Pagoda called Vat in lao I must scan again these pictures I saved in a Western Digital (WD) Hard Drive 500 Mo, just dead and many hundred pictures are lost ... WD after-sales service is null ! My question : save in HD is it safe ? keep your negative preciously Best Henry 8 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Funeral monument . Edward is it correct ? Taken in a Pagoda called Vat in lao I must scan again these pictures I saved in a Western Digital (WD) Hard Drive 500 Mo, just dead and many hundred pictures are lost ... WD after-sales service is null ! My question : save in HD is it safe ? keep your negative preciously Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3268989'>More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32008 Posted May 5, 2017 Hiding in the trees ..... FUJI GA645Zi-1000119.jpg Fuji GA645Zi, Lomography Colour 400 Bob color is like in a fairy tale Excellent Thanks Bob Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32009 Posted May 5, 2017 Before moving on to some more wildlife, a sunset from Kilimanjaro. Flickr 1N 200/2.8L Velvia 50 Spendid Philip . Have you more ? Thanks for posting Best Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32010 Posted May 5, 2017 ... continuation Laos Leica R4S-Summicron 50-Fuji Superia 100 dev lab fuji Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! a Couroupita tree inside the pagoda area statue goddess with three heads Best Henry 6 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! a Couroupita tree inside the pagoda area statue goddess with three heads Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3268995'>More sharing options...
Doug A Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32011 Posted May 5, 2017 Hard Drive 500 Mo, just dead and many hundred pictures are lost ... WD after-sales service is null ! My question : save in HD is it safe ? keep your negative preciously Best Henry A hard drive is a good solution for storing working images for quick access. It is not a good a good solution for archival storage. My scans of negatives, slides and prints are stored on a hard drive backed up in the cloud. I use Carbonite for this but there are many other options for off site backup. My negatives are stored in archival storage boxes in a temperature controlled space. Many of my father's negatives are on nitrocellulose film which is subject to decomposition and possible spontaneous combustion. I have them refrigerated. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32012 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) Photographer in action. Earlier in the year. The Long Man of Wilmington is in the background. Might be Fujifilm 400H, definitely 28 Summaron-M. More recently in a meadow nearby. Portra 400. Edited May 5, 2017 by wattsy 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotomas Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32013 Posted May 5, 2017 I must scan again these pictures I saved in a Western Digital (WD) Hard Drive 500 Mo, just dead and many hundred pictures are lost ... WD after-sales service is null ! My question : save in HD is it safe ? keep your negative preciously Best Henry Unfortunately there is not the one really secure solution for digital long time storage. HD's can crash every time without warning. Best thing you can do is to safe stuff on several different sources. I have some NAS (Network Attached Storage) with higher RAID levels running. Over night they backup on a second drive. But even if the technical stuff works well you can lose all by a user mistake. And I had even a RAID 5 level NAS died suddenly without any possibility to safe the data on it. This causes fortunately no loss of data, since all was also backed up elsewhere. I don't wont to put my pictures in a cloud. But if you don't mind this is a solution too.So beside HDs and NAS I safe stuff also on optical volumes like Blu-ray-discs. You can't overwrite them by mistake. So a mix of two or more volumes or systems should avoid a lot of trouble. HDs might not be very safe, but they are relative cheap. So at least a second one, will give you much more security. I've learned since I stored my diploma thesis years ago on two floppy discs. One of them was unreadable afterwords. Regards Frank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnuyork Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32014 Posted May 5, 2017 C027224-R1-35-35A.jpg m4-2 2/50IV portra 400 Joachim I love the colors in this. Just confirms my recent liking for Portra 400 (I usually prefer slide film colors). I have ordered a 5 pack of this to try, now sitting in my fridge waiting for the right project. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32015 Posted May 5, 2017 Hiding in the trees ..... FUJI GA645Zi-1000119.jpg Fuji GA645Zi, Lomography Colour 400 This is encouraging. I had pretty good luck with the Lomography 120 film, i.e. no horrible results. I do like it; but, given my luck with the Lomography 400 35mm film, I have been hesitant to buy more....of any format. maybe I will purchase some more 120. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobitybob Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32016 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) This is encouraging. I had pretty good luck with the Lomography 120 film, i.e. no horrible results. I do like it; but, given my luck with the Lomography 400 35mm film, I have been hesitant to buy more....of any format. maybe I will purchase some more 120. Wayne Like you I've tried both the 135 and 120 versions with differing results. I'm not sure where Lomography get the stock from or even if the 135 and the 120 are the same, but I've found it can have a strange colour cast, and sometimes even within the same role! I develop my own colour film using the Fuji C41 kit and I've found that there seems to be a LOT of discolouration of the pre-wash/soak water. I have a few roles of both left and after that I'm not sure I will get any more as in my experience it's a bit unpredictable. Edited May 5, 2017 by Bobitybob 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A miller Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32017 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) wonderful, Philip. Sublime colors make it. Top notch rendition of velvia Before moving on to some more wildlife, a sunset from Kilimanjaro. Flickr 1N 200/2.8L Velvia 50 Wonderful, Ian. Like having Keith with us; like you were stepping in his foot prints! Having said this, you were able to successfully order the clouds One from Keith country (don't think I've seen Keith in the thread for a while?). Portra 400. Interesting colors, Bob. Hiding in the trees ..... FUJI GA645Zi-1000119.jpg Fuji GA645Zi, Lomography Colour 400 Great moments to treasure, Ian. Photographer in action. Earlier in the year. The Long Man of Wilmington is in the background. Might be Fujifilm 400H, definitely 28 Summaron-M. More recently in a meadow nearby. Portra 400. Edited May 5, 2017 by A miller 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32018 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) A hard drive is a good solution for storing working images for quick access. It is not a good a good solution for archival storage. My scans of negatives, slides and prints are stored on a hard drive backed up in the cloud. I use Carbonite for this but there are many other options for off site backup. My negatives are stored in archival storage boxes in a temperature controlled space. Many of my father's negatives are on nitrocellulose film which is subject to decomposition and possible spontaneous combustion. I have them refrigerated. Unfortunately there is not the one really secure solution for digital long time storage. HD's can crash every time without warning. Best thing you can do is to safe stuff on several different sources. I have some NAS (Network Attached Storage) with higher RAID levels running. Over night they backup on a second drive. But even if the technical stuff works well you can lose all by a user mistake. And I had even a RAID 5 level NAS died suddenly without any possibility to safe the data on it. This causes fortunately no loss of data, since all was also backed up elsewhere. I don't wont to put my pictures in a cloud. But if you don't mind this is a solution too. So beside HDs and NAS I safe stuff also on optical volumes like Blu-ray-discs. You can't overwrite them by mistake. So a mix of two or more volumes or systems should avoid a lot of trouble. HDs might not be very safe, but they are relative cheap. So at least a second one, will give you much more security. I've learned since I stored my diploma thesis years ago on two floppy discs. One of them was unreadable afterwords. Regards Frank Hi Doug and Frank, first great thanks for your advices. The problem is that you depend on an external backup source which can also crash Another dependency is your computer with the OS windows XP finished , Vista etc.... now windows 10 We have a syndicate website with all the files we have archived in , the server has exploded and all the files have disappeared including images External dependence may not be only the right way The hard drives can crash too and Western Digital Belgium did not even offer me to retrieve my images, hence my opinion of after sales service. These are people who sell to earn money, and then after you must find yourself the solution .Bad brand ! So I downloaded recovery software but nothing to do, the hard drive is dead, nothing Finally I tried another HD brand Toshiba 1TB and it seems work better but I'm wary now Fortunately these are digital images M9-M8 that I lost the most ! ... but I will still think about your suggestions. Thanks again Doug and Frank Best Henry Edited May 5, 2017 by Doc Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share #32019 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) Photographer in action. Earlier in the year. The Long Man of Wilmington is in the background. Might be Fujifilm 400H, definitely 28 Summaron-M. More recently in a meadow nearby. Portra 400. Lovely pictures and nice color Ian Ha color of Kodak Portra 400 is great Ian you must give to your daughter one of your M for shooting , but not smartphone please ! Thanks for posting Best Henry Edited May 5, 2017 by Doc Henry 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshtog Posted May 5, 2017 Share #32020 Posted May 5, 2017 A few shots from yesterday, Leica M4-2, Voigtlander 35mm 2.5. Tri-X 400 rated at 400 and developed by me with ilfosol 3 This is the first film i've hand developed in years so I'm not sure if i overcooked. I went by recommended times but maybe i over agitated it. Seems a little grainy to me. 17 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now