ramarren Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31101 Posted April 22, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I shot weddings in the early 1970s, all film of course. I did candida with the Nikon; the guy I worked for did the formals with the Hasselblad. I can't imagine that any of what we did then is at all relevant to today's wedding photography. Or to the enjoyment of doing a bit of film photography in 2017, whether it's your main photo habit or a sideline to your digital work. I can't imagine justifying what I like to do on the basis of what it costs in any way. Do what you like doing and enjoy it. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 22, 2017 Posted April 22, 2017 Hi ramarren, Take a look here I like film...(open thread). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31102 Posted April 22, 2017 Every so often, a selfie is essential. As is a Polaroid ... or rather, an Impossible Project ... camera: Impossible Project I-1, out of date Impossible Project color film enjoy! Looking good, Godfrey. It looks like you successfully caught yourself offguard! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31103 Posted April 22, 2017 my first try to make a double exposure: Double Exposure by Dirk Raffel, auf Flickr Nice work, Dirk! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31104 Posted April 22, 2017 Another from that foggy morning. Love how the Ektar is sometimes like a box of chocolates... more bridge fog1.jpg This is special, Adam. Chocolate was exactly what I thought of when I saw it. Wonderful! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31105 Posted April 22, 2017 Will try to lower the high standard of this thread with a few photos of mine M7 ZM 50/2 Delta 400 by edward karaa, on Flickr M7 ZM 50/2 Delta 400 by edward karaa, on Flickr M7 ZM 50/2 Portra 400 by edward karaa, on Flickr M7 ZM 50/2 Portra 400 by edward karaa, on Flickr I like this series of shots, Edward. Positive effect on Thread Standards, I would say. I'm back up in Bangkok tomorrow night for some meetings on Monday, but don't know that I'll get a chance to do any photography. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31106 Posted April 22, 2017 I rolled about 5 shots of UN54 (iso 100) to test new Voigtlander 21mmF4 Skopar and shot it at iso 400 and stand developed it in Rodinal Nothing special but lens looks ok Sat waiting for security to open up for camera club, i usually get pestered for cash from homeless while waiting 1/15 handheld, a few member congregate in cafe area before lecture starts, not sure how i managed to scratch this shot Looks good, Gary. The detail in the gentleman's cardigan / jersey / jumper is impressive. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31107 Posted April 22, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) Most of my working life was with film cameras. Hasselblads, Nikons, and later, Leicas. I shot many many weddings exclusively on Hasselblads, but shooting what I called 'setup candid' as well as true candid. It was very heavy hard work and I could cope with it then. Not now. I also did many many theatrical shoots the same way! Then I discovered Leicas and that changed everything for me. The cost of film etc for a typical stage production had my out of pocket expenses running at $500. The advent of reliable digital technology sudden put that $500 back in my pocket, yet still commanded the same bottom line for the client. Why would I ever shoot another film assignment? Only if the client requested it specifically. They never have. I still love shooting for myself on my film cameras, when I can afford to. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31108 Posted April 22, 2017 I like this series of shots, Edward. Positive effect on Thread Standards, I would say. I'm back up in Bangkok tomorrow night for some meetings on Monday, but don't know that I'll get a chance to do any photography. Thank you very much Eoin! Let me know if you're free for a cup of coffee. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31109 Posted April 22, 2017 Regarding the film vs digital debate, I think the market has moved on away from film entirely, except for a very small niche segment. If I relied on photography for my living, I have no doubt I would be shooting digital, and probably not with a M. Luckily I'm just a hobbyist, so I can do any crazy thing I want, and I would classify my selling of my digital M and switching to analog exclusively as one of those crazy decisions, but I'm loving it 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31110 Posted April 22, 2017 Got back in the Darkroom with no issue this time.....I always get it right with Rollei but always wrong with TMax....very strange! Those are shot on my Contax T2 with Rollei 400s These are good, Jonnyboy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31111 Posted April 22, 2017 M7/Summicron 35/Ilford FP4+/Ilford D-DX home development: Porto; I really like the atmosphere of Portugal! Very nice work, Paul - Thanks. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31112 Posted April 22, 2017 my wife still prefers digital... :-) Rolleiflex 3.5f and Fuji Acros Leica by Dirk Raffel, auf Flickr I really like this shot, Dirk. Great tones and detail, and still the deep Acros blacks. Well done. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31113 Posted April 22, 2017 Thank you very much Eoin! Let me know if you're free for a cup of coffee. Thanks, Edward. I think I'll be fully engaged for this trip, but I'll be back up again fairly soon. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted April 22, 2017 Author Share #31114 Posted April 22, 2017 (edited) Regarding the film vs digital debate, I think the market has moved on away from film entirely, except for a very small niche segment. If I relied on photography for my living, I have no doubt I would be shooting digital, and probably not with a M. Luckily I'm just a hobbyist, so I can do any crazy thing I want, and I would classify my selling of my digital M and switching to analog exclusively as one of those crazy decisions, but I'm loving it Hi Edward ,Steve,Erl and Hi All For wedding,I like that people keep their natural expression and take the picture at that time, It is better to be discreet , not like the professional photographers I see with their big SLR cameras that want everyone see them, and in addition use their flash, I believe it is not discretion but a photographic exhibition I find that the M cameras respond perfectly to what I have just said. About film versus digital , apart from the practical side that I understand, if I am a professional, my price for the film will be a bit more expensive and if you tell your customers before and well explain to them, I think they will understand. Photographic art is the best in quality. Pictures must have a soul , not synthetic very important for me What do you think ? Best Henry Edited April 22, 2017 by Doc Henry 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsgary Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31115 Posted April 22, 2017 Looks good, Gary. The detail in the gentleman's cardigan / jersey / jumper is impressive.It's going to get some good light today so hope I will come back with something better Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Henry Posted April 22, 2017 Author Share #31116 Posted April 22, 2017 (edited) Here artistic side of wedding pictures You can like or not , but the married asked me to enlarge this picture Kodak TX400-MP-50 Summilux Asph Grain is really beautiful with Kodak TX400, a great film of Kodak Etienne Wedding I know him when he just born, begin to be old when see pictures Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry Edited April 22, 2017 by Doc Henry 8 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best Henry ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/205842-i-like-filmopen-thread/?do=findComment&comment=3259683'>More sharing options...
edwardkaraa Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31117 Posted April 22, 2017 Here artistic side of wedding pictures You can like or not , but the married asked me to enlarge this picture Kodak TX400-MP-50 Summilux Asph Grain is really beautiful with Kodak TX400, a great film of Kodak Etienne Wedding I know him when he just born, begin to be old when see pictures Image11audreyeteglavizk400m7ht+++(2)1200-50.jpg Best Henry Beautiful! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirkR440 Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31118 Posted April 22, 2017 one more double exposure: Double Exposure by Dirk Raffel, auf Flickr I need to practice a bit more with that... 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EoinC Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31119 Posted April 22, 2017 Test today (I managed to scratch the negative) - EOS-1V HS w/ Zeiss ZE APO 135 f/2.0 (Fuji Neopan Acros 100)... B001 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr B002 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr B003 by Eoin Christie, on Flickr 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beresford Posted April 22, 2017 Share #31120 Posted April 22, 2017 Wall Street, NYC IIIg, 50mm collapsible, Portra 400 That is a beautiful and touching moment. And the light is lovely. Is your 50mm collapsible a new one or an old? I have a 50mm collapsible Summicron and it is beautiful in all those Leica-ery qualities (rendering, bokeh, etc) but the front glass is as soft as the skin on a custard tart and previous owners have wiped it clean with sand paper. It's like having a built in softar. (What a ramble!) My question is, "New or old?" 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now