Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

Harold nice place where you can eat delicious meals

Superb color of Ektar

M6 is still a good camera

I'll post for you some pictures of this place with my Summicon 28

Thanks for sharing Harold. Glad you join us :)

May be the second picture will be also great in color no ?

With my experience and I already post above some examples you lose

some details in black , when you converted color > b&w

Best

Henry

 

Thank you Henry

 

Yes sometimes the choice between B&W and colour is personal taste. Whether to focus on form and function or the kaleidoscope

 

Some pictures I just take because I like the colour (again Ektar + M6/Voigt):

 

33732772471_49d89aa15d_b_d.jpg

Edited by colonel
  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

For Harold , with Kodak Portra (KP) 160 and Kodak Portra 400 :)

 

 

London China Town 2015

 

Leica M7- 28 Summicron A.

 

KP 160

 

 

KP 400

 

Regards

Henry

 

One can clearly see the difference with the lower contrast/more detail of the Portra vs the Ektar

 

I should branch out and maybe try a pack of 10 Portra for my next order ...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One can clearly see the difference with the lower contrast/more detail of the Portra vs the Ektar

 

I should branch out and maybe try a pack of 10 Portra for my next order ...

 

Harold yes may be the red warmer with Portra and if you like the red of Kodak CCD sensor M8 or M9.

I have the same pictures with M8 and M9 . I can post if you are interested :)

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kodak TMAX100-Leica R4S-Summicron 50 (1986)

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Kodak Portra 160-Leicaflex SL-Summicron 50 (1970)

 

 

Which you prefer ? color or b&w or both ?

same wild cherry  :) in contre-jour

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra 160 dev myself in Tetenal at 38°C

Kodak TMAX100 dev myself in Kodak Pro D76 at 22°C

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This is not from that day but dewy grass near where I had the MOT for the car one morning. I just wanted to see what it would look like on film.

 

33638522172_eb1b99d0d1_b.jpg

Flickr

TTL 90 Elmarit-M Velvia 100 (EI50)

 

Very nice Philip , very subtle dew drops well reproduced by film

Superb green color of grass

Thanks for posting

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Open flea market "les Puces de Saint Ouen" (one gate of Paris)

We can chine, bargain and find old antiques, old cameras etc....

I don't know if Gary knows this place

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Ouen,_Seine-Saint-Denis

 

Kodak Portra 400 for Harold :)

 

 

Kodak Portra 400-Leica R8-35-70 Vario Elmar (lens made in Japan)

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great Adam. Does the Tecnnika Press allow shift at all? That might have straightened the verticals a bit. Still, it's a very nice photo.

 

A rare foggy morning in NYC..

The Manhattan Bridge

Linhof Technika Press (late 1950's) 6x9, 53mm Zeiss Biogon, Ektar

attachicon.giffoggy morning in NYC.jpg

 

I really like the first one Henry.

 

For Harold , with Kodak Portra (KP) 160 and Kodak Portra 400 :)

 

 

London China Town 2015

 

Leica M7- 28 Summicron A.

 

KP 160

 

attachicon.gifImage2soholondkp400fecctlfht+++950.jpg

 

KP 400

 

attachicon.gifImage2chintkp400lfht+++950.jpg

 

Regards

Henry

 

Love this one Harold. Very well spotted and composed. Plus fantastic colour of course.

 

Thank you Henry

 

Yes sometimes the choice between B&W and colour is personal taste. Whether to focus on form and function or the kaleidoscope

 

Some pictures I just take because I like the colour (again Ektar + M6/Voigt):

 

33732772471_49d89aa15d_b_d.jpg

 

I prefer the black and white one by far Henry.

 

Kodak TMAX100-Leica R4S-Summicron 50 (1986)

 

attachicon.gifImage4rscankodtmax100r4slfht+++1000.jpg

 

Kodak Portra 160-Leicaflex SL-Summicron 50 (1970)

 

attachicon.gifImage17cerrscankp16slfesctlfht+++1000.jpg

 

Which you prefer ? color or b&w or both ?

same wild cherry  :) in contre-jour

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra 160 dev myself in Tetenal at 38°C

Kodak TMAX100 dev myself in Kodak Pro D76 at 22°C

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm feeling very stupid. Only ever having used an enlarger for 35mm before, I was only dimly aware that I needed a longer focal length lens for bigger negatives. This ought to solve my vignetting issue. Thank goodness for eBay and the numerous brands of enlarger lenses made in Rochester in years gone by.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Henry.  Hope you are getting along ok.

Superb this picture Adam

Best

Henry

 

Ha, ha, you are right :)

Yet again Adam is delayed on his way into work to all of our advantage ;)

 

B&W for me, Henry.

Kodak TMAX100-Leica R4S-Summicron 50 (1986)

 

attachicon.gifImage4rscankodtmax100r4slfht+++1000.jpg

 

Kodak Portra 160-Leicaflex SL-Summicron 50 (1970)

 

attachicon.gifImage17cerrscankp16slfesctlfht+++1000.jpg

 

Which you prefer ? color or b&w or both ?

same wild cherry  :) in contre-jour

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra 160 dev myself in Tetenal at 38°C

Kodak TMAX100 dev myself in Kodak Pro D76 at 22°C

 

 

Thanks, Philip.  The camera does have a small tilt potential.  But I am not that proficient with Schimpflug.  I will tinker a little with the horizontals and vertical in LR and see what i can come up with. 

 

This is great Adam. Does the Tecnnika Press allow shift at all? That might have straightened the verticals a bit. Still, it's a very nice photo.

 

 

I really like the first one Henry.

 

 

Love this one Harold. Very well spotted and composed. Plus fantastic colour of course.

 

 

I prefer the black and white one by far Henry.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good call, Adam. The smaller cameras do fit a niche - pocketability. I once bought a Contax T3 with just that idea in mind, but it had a fault with the film advance so i returned it and didn't bother again.

 

Leicas fitting into pockets is, of course, also a factor of how big your pockets are. Hmmm... how big your pockets are.. this applies to Leica in more than one sense of the phrase!

 

An LTM Leica with a collapsible 50mm Elmar is pretty pocketable and doesn't require particularly deep pockets either  :)

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

[snip]

 

Btw, any particular ballheads one should consider for the table-top?

 

I think the KGOON is as good as it gets. I had the later large ball head but it would not rotate quite 90º to the side making it pretty useless for portrait orientation shots. The KGOON on the Leitz table top tripod makes an excellent chest pod too. 

Edited by Doug A
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A  GR21 in the left pocket ... 

(Ektar 100)

 

29996850126_2585d2a85b_b.jpg

Vidigal by JM__, on Flickr

 

and a GR1V in the right pocket...

(Ilford 3200)

 

14161861628_609ed79f83_b.jpg

Arpoador sunset beach "futebol" by JM__, on Flickr

 

I'm all set :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The perfectionist within is annoyed with the flare, there are a few shots with it, so either the light bouncing between the filter and front element, or simple flare, not sure, but annoyed.

 

Tripod I have is this:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/983551-REG/manfrotto_mtpixi_b_pixi_mini_table_top.html

Perfect for travel, cheap as chips, and light, certainly lighter than the Leitz. Whether it would hold the Hasselblad etc I can't say, try mine in August. I did use my Leitz with the SWC recently, but possibly a bit lighter than your 203++++. Ball-head is part of it, built in. For my Leitz I have the Leitz ball.

 

A-16 is the Hasselblad frugal film back, I always used them for wedding work, similar to the Bronica etc, and gives (I think) 6x4.5 dimensions. 16 shots on a roll is always going to be more cost effective than 12. The Bronica etc is "15 on", Hasselblad went one better and get 16 on. Orientation is landscape of course, but back in the days Hasselblad also made a 6x4.5V back, so portrait orientation, but of course, 12 shots, with wastage on either side, never could figure that one out. With the SCW I simply rotate the camera, but lose the eye-level bubble of course.

Gary

Sure, certainly agree on this! I've got the pixi 2.0, and that is capable of holding a bronica etrc. Which I guess is about similar in weight to a Hasselblad
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I visited 2 days ago an organic farm products . Vegetables in general
are produced in this farm.
And the farmer I have known for over 10 years , in reality I know his uncle

who retire now and his nephew Sébastien took over the operation.
He agreed that I would take some pictures.

 

So here are these pictures developed yesterday

 

All are taken with my Leica MP with a Summilux 50 Asph

Film is Kodak TMAX400 ,  the first time I use this film on the MP !

 

Thanks for watching and for your comment ?

 

I hope I can post all the series in the same time

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

The dog of the master looks at  the work  :)

 

 

I learned that the Israelis are the strongest in this type of culture.

Watering hose from Israël

 

 

... continuation... :)

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Rg

H.

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris , one question about developer dilution. You think it's better to dilute like you 1+50

or use pure or dilute 1+10 or another dilution . How about grain when you dilute 1+50 versus 1+10

how about contrast , defintion , b&w tone etc... better in what dilution ?

and also dev time ? I think much time when you dilute

Thanks

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kodak TMAX100-Leica R4S-Summicron 50 (1986)

 

 

Kodak Portra 160-Leicaflex SL-Summicron 50 (1970)

 

 

Which you prefer ? color or b&w or both ?

same wild cherry  :) in contre-jour

 

Best

Henry

 

Kodak Portra 160 dev myself in Tetenal at 38°C

Kodak TMAX100 dev myself in Kodak Pro D76 at 22°C

Colour for me Henry, but to my mind blossom is all about colour.

Gary

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...