Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I was concerned that the meter in my Rolleiflex wasn't right, so I used up a film with duplicate exposures, one using the internal meter and one using an external spotmeter. It turns out I was right,and the internal meter underexposes by 1-2 stops, but the funny thing is that the underexposed negatives allow me to pull out more detail in scans. This might be a quirk of the XP2 I was using. Anyway, one of the 'underexposed' negatives:

 

33272354456_57381a3d82_c.jpg

test film by chrism229, on Flickr

 

C.

I like your conclusion. I shoot XP2 as well and have often thought about shooting for the highlights and letting the shadows look after themselves just as for slide film. I have never been bold enough to deliberately do it though. After this I think I may just give it a try. Thanks for posting your findings.

 

Kind regards

 

Christopher

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by mrckdavies
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Kodak 4 ...

 

After the scanning of the last MF-rolls, I realized the "water marks" on the scans .. :wacko:

 

attachicon.gifGER_Chiemsee_R3_Porta400_07_listo.jpg

 

Hasselblad 500cm, Kodak Porta 400 -> :angry: , Epson V700

Personally, I really like the effect, given that it's a "happy accident" and not a deliberate affectation. I think the reason for it is that the roll film gas been stored for a long time, perhaps in conditions where there is quite a lot of light and/or heat. You see this effect with Holgas a lot - part of their charm - and usually associated with the light leaks and fogging that their plastic bodies encourage. As there is no evidence of the latter two "faults" in your lovely picture I think we can fairly safely conclude that there is no light leak from the camera back (as you'd expect from a Hasselblad magazine) but that perhaps the film has been stored (before being loaded into the camera) for a long time under less than ideal conditions.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...under African skies...with the M4 in the Kruger National Park in SouthAfrica...

 

attachicon.gifSüdafrika 2017 (11 von 19).jpg

 

M4 + ZM Planar 2/50 - CHM100 - D76 - V800

 

 

 

 

...again Kruger Park

 

attachicon.gifSüdafrika 2017 (15 von 19).jpg

 

M4 + ZM Planar 2/50 - CHM100 - D76 - V800

 

 

Excellent photos, Brabu.  Thanks for sharing!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kodak 4 ...

 

After the scanning of the last MF-rolls, I realized the "water marks" on the scans .. :wacko:

 

attachicon.gifGER_Chiemsee_R3_Porta400_07_listo.jpg

 

Hasselblad 500cm, Kodak Porta 400 -> :angry: , Epson V700

Oh man, Gregor, I totally sympathize with you!  This is a beautiful shot and Kodak totally F'd it up for you.  That exact same thing happened to my with a 120 roll of Tmax recently.  The photos were really great but for those Kodak stamps all over.  Honestly, it is such a nice photo that it might work even with the stamps!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Henry is protesting my snow blizzard series. :angry:

 

Here's a "no comment" for Gary... :)

 

Wall Street.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by A miller
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

XPan, Fuji Superia 400.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

...mother and child...


 


Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


 


M4 + Summarit 2,5/75 - CHM100 - D76 - V800


  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Christopher, I don't have any idea what is going wrong. My workflow is always the same, so it could be only an material issue? Never see it before ...

I hope you don't mind me asking, but how did that happen? I have shot and developed many 6x6 rolls of slide film in times past, but never seen that before.

Kind regards

Christopher


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Phil, I would think that your suspicion could be true or is plausible .... but ... the film was stored in a big old oke cabinet. Which is good for my "Gran Reservas" should be good enough for my films :). But who knows what's happen in the time before. I know there was a problem in the production of Kodak last year and is was impossible to get b/w-rolls ... maybe that is the reason of Adams experiences ...

Personally, I really like the effect, given that it's a "happy accident" and not a deliberate affectation. I think the reason for it is that the roll film gas been stored for a long time, perhaps in conditions where there is quite a lot of light and/or heat. You see this effect with Holgas a lot - part of their charm - and usually associated with the light leaks and fogging that their plastic bodies encourage. As there is no evidence of the latter two "faults" in your lovely picture I think we can fairly safely conclude that there is no light leak from the camera back (as you'd expect from a Hasselblad magazine) but that perhaps the film has been stored (before being loaded into the camera) for a long time under less than ideal conditions.

 

Adam, I was crying! Thank you for your kind comment.

Oh man, Gregor, I totally sympathize with you!  This is a beautiful shot and Kodak totally F'd it up for you.  That exact same thing happened to my with a 120 roll of Tmax recently.  The photos were really great but for those Kodak stamps all over.  Honestly, it is such a nice photo that it might work even with the stamps!

 

 

OK ... I have to give Kodak a second chance. I bought new roll of Porta 400/160 .... unfortunately before I saw the stamps.  :angry: 

 

Gentleman, thank you so much for your sympathy.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kodak 4 ...

 

After the scanning of the last MF-rolls, I realized the "water marks" on the scans .. :wacko:

 

attachicon.gifGER_Chiemsee_R3_Porta400_07_listo.jpg

 

Hasselblad 500cm, Kodak Porta 400 -> :angry: , Epson V700

 

I hope you don't mind me asking, but how did that happen? 

 

Personally, I really like the effect, given that it's a "happy accident" and not a deliberate affectation. I think the reason for it is that the roll film gas been stored for a long time, perhaps in conditions where there is quite a lot of light and/or heat.

 

Oh man, Gregor, I totally sympathize with you!  This is a beautiful shot and Kodak totally F'd it up for you.  That exact same thing happened to my with a 120 roll of Tmax recently.

 

 

This is a well documented problem with recent batches of some Kodak 120 film. It is believed to be why 120 T-Max 100 has not been available for months and your's isn't the first time I've heard of it happening with 120 Portra 400 too. Andy Piper has written quite a bit about this in the film forum here. There is more discussion here on APUG.

Edited by wattsy
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Erl. Can you choose the second shutter on an M7?

I am really an idiot when it comes to flash. I just point and shoot and hope for the best. So often it all comes down to various elements falling into place along with a streak of luck - and not so much the execution of a technically correct workflow. But I am always open to suggestions!

It is probably on the flash settings if it is possible

 

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did this mural ages ago with the R8, went back with the SWC, and cropped it to lose the extraneous top and bottom areas.

SWC

FP4+

R09 1:50

Gary

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kenya watering hole. XP2, if anyone cares.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adam, not to worry at all, I think I phrased my question rather poorly actually. I meant on a more general level, what does public appeal mean. I think you are completely right that a strong composition and in your face execution is much more interesting - as in appeals to more people, because either they like it or they don't like it, thereby having a greater 'public appeal' since it causes more discussion, emotions etc - than a photo which is blander and less provocative. The ones I posted clearly fall in this second category. I certainly didn't take your comment as suggesting there's only one way or a limited number of ways to shoot with flash in the street. A few ideas I've had during the evenings I've been out is how the flash would work with the 85mm diffuser and my 90 Elmarit-M at different distances, or with a 50mm lens and shooting people from above (though here in NL it's difficult to find people shorter than I am, and I'm pretty tall...) etc. So I have several things I want to try out.

 

It's actually more than 20 years since I last shot seriously with flash and then never in more interesting and challenging circumstances (rather more like party or social settings). Then the flash and some other stuff was stolen during a break-in in my apartment in Sarajevo, damned crooks. In fact, if you hadn't started posting pictures shot using the SF-24D I would probably not have looked into that flash. It's a terrific unit so now I look forward to developing my flash skills, and the necessary courage, and will hopefully post more interesting results soon. I am grateful for your offer to give feedback (and I remember you did so once before about the reflections photos, which I also appreciate a lot) and I'll definitely bother you about that at some point :)

 

Hi Philip - Thanks for your response.  I don't want to make it seem that there is a finite way of shooting strangers with flash.  So please forgive me if this is how it came across and feel free to ignore me.  You have your own thing going and your own views regarding what you are after.  Totally respect and support your interest and skills in this area.   I guess my only hang up is that after your first few posts I was not getting a sense of your vision of what type of look you are trying to achieve.  I am excited to just sit back and let you do your thing and enjoy the results.  I am always happy to provide feedback should you specifically request it.  All the best, adam

 

These are truly terrific wildlife shots, Matthias, very enjoyable.

 

 

...again Kruger Park

 

attachicon.gifSüdafrika 2017 (15 von 19).jpg

 

M4 + ZM Planar 2/50 - CHM100 - D76 - V800

 

 

I like this one a lot Wayne. Terrific colours. It makes me want to buy a much wider monitor to enjoy it even more.

 

XPan, Fuji Superia 400.

attachicon.gifimg110 (1)-2.JPG

Edited by philipus
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...