Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I continue with Kodachrome 64 slide :)

Frames slides were made of cardboard, carefully framed as those of the last series

before the disappearance of Kodachrome. It's the digital that "killedKodachrome !
all this , for reasons of efficiency and speed  and no search for beauty in the sense of art :angry:
Sad time

 

Avoriaz

 

M7- 50 Summicron

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

I continue with Kodachrome 64 slide :)

Frames slides were made of cardboard, carefully framed as those of the last series

before the disappearance of Kodachrome. It's the digital that "killed"  Kodachrome !

all this , for reasons of efficiency and speed  and no search for beauty in the sense of art :angry:

Sad time

 

Avoriaz

 

M7- 50 Summicron

 

attachicon.gifImage5cluskodaclfht+++-950.jpg

 

Best

Henry

Hi Henry - wow, this is beautiful.  Can I suggest this very quick and dirty slight adjustment to your WB (which in your shot seems slightly off balance in favor of the green hues)...?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Adam, it is Maurice Chevalier ?

Beautiful photo of 1968's , not sure you have the same result quality with the digital after 47 years !

Nice pictures of Paul Newman and Angie Dickinson.

Best

Henry

Yes, Henry.  You are right!  And I am also impressed at how well the negatives have held up in less than ideal conditions.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much Adam! I think that film is perfect for this kind of look, digital would be too clean.

 

I like your old photos a lot. Although so old, they look very good. Especially the blonde hair of the lady in photo 1 is really an eyecatcher.

 

best regards

Marc

Thanks, Marc and James.

Fascinating Adam! Even for non Americans this image (and the others) makes for interesting viewing and I'm sure there is a story to tell as to their making by your father and the camera you now use.

Do tell,

Charles

Shortly after my father's passing about 5 years ago, I found a stash of very meticulously organized 6x7 (mostly) color film negatives from movies stars, entertainers and politicians, mostly from the late 60's. All shot on the same Linhof Technika Press (6x9) camera that I use today. Mostly using a flash. He developed himself in his own darkroom. It took me over 2 years to scan all 824 negatives at the highest resolution on my nikon coolscan 9000. Each negative is kept in a simple wax paper sleeve along with a contact print and organized by event (which was usually an opening night or a gala dinner or political convention), along with a little note listing the famous people in the photos.

I am (very) slowly going through the photos and making basic edits so that they are in shape for the next stage in the process, which is some type of public showing (whether in a book, gallery, donation and/or private sale).

What interests me the most about the photos are the fashion statements that are made and the relaxed atmosphere with which people enjoyed themselves at these events, with the free heavy smoking and drinking.

According to my father, it was quite easy to gain access to these events. All he needed to do was wear his tuxedo and bring his camera (ok, and maybe a little chutzpah, the apple doesnt fall far...) and he was generally allowed in. Back then, entertainers were seeking out ways to get their faces into the public mainstream, and my father's camera was thus generally welcomed. I would also note that, back then, it was unusual to shoot these events with medium format color film, which I think makes them somewhat unique.

 

I can share a few others here and there if people are interested. But I by no means want to wear out the welcome.

 

Thanks for your comments and interest...

Edited by A miller
  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Henry - wow, this is beautiful.  Can I suggest this very quick and dirty slight adjustment to your WB (which in your shot seems slightly off balance in favor of the green hues)...?

Adam, you prefer this version with no WB setting ?

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Nikon Coolscan 5000

RGB calibrated at the output of the scanner in Tiff > Jpeg for post

with no correction

 

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam, you prefer this version with no WB setting ?

 

attachicon.gifImage5cluskodaclfhtcef+++950.jpg

 

Nikon Coolscan 5000

RGB calibrated at the output of the scanner in Tiff > Jpeg for post

with no correction

 

Henry

 

Hmm, this version appears too cool to me.

What do others think?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

one of my rare cat photos

 

in Kodachrome 64

no correction

 

R4S-Summicron 50

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best

Henry

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, this version appears too cool to me.

What do others think?

I felt the first one Henry posted was way too green, and yours Adam is better, but still has that green tinge.

Maybe it is simply age that has caused the slide to change?

Gary

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gary,

 

Unlike certain other slide/transparency technologies: Kodachromes, from the earliest versions in the 1930's, have had colors that are less prone to fading than many other slide/transparency materials. Kodak said they were stable for at least 100 years.

 

Not that long ago I looked at a large number of 11" X 14"  Kodachrome transparencies done in the 1940's. They looked like they were taken today. Grain was like it is on a 24mm X 36mm Kodachrome slide. The rich, clear colors were slightly different. They were NOT faded.

 

Henry,

 

I prefer the colors in your original Post.

 

Also:

 

I think the retirement of Kodachrome came because of a combination of its being a relatively low volume, more complex (expensive) technology. This was coupled with Kodachrome having more of an ecological downside when compared to the more universal E6 process films.

 

All of the above does not stop you & me from considering Kodachrome our favorite slide/transparency film.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

Edited by Michael Geschlecht
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, this version appears too cool to me.

What do others think?

 

I think your version is about right. Here is my suggestion, which should be similar:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Sorry for messing around with your image, Henry :)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can share a few others here and there if people are interested. But I by no means want to wear out the welcome.

 

Thanks for your comments and interest...

By all means keep them coming, Adam.  The images, apart from their superb quality, form a recent history & lifestyle record.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica M-A/DR50/TX400

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gary,

 

Unlike certain other slide/transparency technologies: Kodachromes, from the earliest versions in the 1930's, have had colors that are less prone to fading than many other slide/transparency materials. Kodak said they were stable for at least 100 years.

 

Not that long ago I looked at a large number of 11" X 14"  Kodachrome transparencies done in the 1940's. They looked like they were taken today. Grain was like it is on a 24mm X 36mm Kodachrome slide. The rich, clear colors were slightly different. They were NOT faded.

 

Henry,

 

I prefer the colors in your original Post.

 

Also:

 

I think the retirement of Kodachrome came because of a combination of its being a relatively low volume, more complex (expensive) technology. This was coupled with Kodachrome having more of an ecological downside when compared to the more universal E6 process films.

 

All of the above does not stop you & me from considering Kodachrome our favorite slide/transparency film.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael

 

I have to agree… the original version looks the best, like the Kodachrome it is. The other versions are all interesting as well, it should be said.

 

James

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stunning James , almost in 3D

Beautiful composition

 

Nice picture JNU

Good contrast and nice framing

 

Best regards to both of you

Henry

 

Sorry for the late response, been away from the thread for a few days and it moves so quickly!

Thanks, Henry. I have some prints of these that came out rather well, too.

 

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam, you prefer this version with no WB setting ?

 

attachicon.gifImage5cluskodaclfhtcef+++950.jpg

 

Nikon Coolscan 5000

RGB calibrated at the output of the scanner in Tiff > Jpeg for post

with no correction

 

Henry

Henry - Please include me in the Kodachrome fan club, although I am trying hard not to cry too moocher spilt milk...

As for your photo, which is one of your best and very Ansel Adams-like, I very much like the natural look of the very first one you posted.  Having said this, the clouds have a green cast and I just don't know that I have ever seen this color of cast on clouds.  I have noticed plenty of blue in clouds, even reds and magentas, but never greens.  So all I was trying to do was get the green-red hues to balance.  I was recently in my neighborhood bookstore and picked up a book on Ansel Adam's portfolio of landscapes taken with Kodachrome.  After wiping up my drool on the book (which I nearly had to pay for it was so bad), I noticed very clearly the perfect WB in the photos.  The color palette was just so sublime.  In any case, my guess is that the negative may have taken up a cast due to age and that this cast showed up on the auto WB setting on your scanner.  Just a guess.  In any case, I wish that one day I am in such a majestic setting that I can take this type of photo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, friends, here is someone that we all should know, although not necessarily with the goatee...

1968

Kodak Safety Film of some sort...

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your version is about right. Here is my suggestion, which should be similar:

 

attachicon.gifBild-1-2.jpg

 

Sorry for messing around with your image, Henry :)

 

 

I thought Henry's original version was fine. I have a calibrated monitor, maybe it's different for others.

 

Edit: I didn't see A miller's edit, I guess his does seem more neutral. Good job, Adam.

Edited by gnuyork
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...