Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One of the fun things to try with LF cameras are paper negatives, using printing paper. This morning I did an experiment with pre-flashing the paper by making an exposure (1/4 the 'taking' exposure) with a piece of plain paper in front of the lens (this is to reduce the biting contrast of the orthochromatic paper).

 

Chamonix 10x8, Symmar-S 360/6.8, Kenthene RC glossy Gr2, Ilford MG developer, V850 scans:

 

23644341852_e850845971_c.jpg

Paper Negative #16 - no preflash by chrism229, on Flickr

 

23124684884_b896dbc254_c.jpg

Paper Negative #17 - paper preflashed by chrism229, on Flickr

 

These were actually the 5th and 6th exposures I took. The first four were attempts at guessing the exposure, using two CFT lights and one strobe. I ended up taking these two with eight exposures of one second, and during each one second exposure the flash fired twice! Obviously my guess at rating this paper at ISO12 was, umm, inaccurate, as my flash meter had indicated that a single one second exposure would do it.

 

And to go from the sublime to the ridiculous, having spent the morning at that, I was inspired to clean up and take out my wife's Pen FT this afternoon. She bought it in 1978, and it must have been ten years old then, and hasn't been used for 35 years. The negatives are sitting in some Rodinal at the moment.

 

Chris

Good demonstration of the capacity of film and silver paper Chris

Very nice pictures

Best

Henry

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Portra 400 can also do black and white (follow up to my previous photo). I think I might start shooting more of this film (with the intention of converting it to B&W) rather than the C41 black and white that I find myself shooting more of at this time of year. 

 

23644899202_e722907d9c_b.jpg

Very nice picture in contre jour

Ian I'll try to find the photo enlargements where I made the comparison between the Portra 400 and the TX400

I'll post.

If you really want a beautiful black and white, it is better to use the TX400 as said Gary :)

The color conversion to black and white lose definition and parts of the photo was a bizarre and clogged black like

with the MM !

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

While I can't/won't argue with your reasoning Ian, why? Why not shoot B&W to start with?

Having seen the above photo I can see it works, and works well. Is it so you can also have the original colour shot?

I find I am always using B&W, I like the "look", and I seem to like the process, with the ability to wet print if and when the mood takes me.

Gary

To follow what I said above to Ian, I must make the comparison with a color negative and black and white with my enlarger and printing on paper to see :)

Best

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

23516257922_46f8538f43_b.jpgLondon by -Ric Capucho-

 

 

London! Now using Ilford Delta 100, and handheld at night with the available light. Been playing with handheld night recently to see how I might bring the ghosts out.

 

The good news is that pictures often work, and I do get interesting ghost effects.

 

The bad news is that soooooo many photos are complete throw aways.

 

Oh, and I much prefer the look, contrast and grain of Delta 100 to the XP2. It's not a question of grain size, but more of type of grain. But ISO 100 is too slow for my usual street photography, and hence my anticipated switch to HP5+ just as soon as I run down my stash of XP2.

 

Ric

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

very clever, Marc.  The "strung-out" look is very intriguing :)

Thank you very much Adam! I think that film is perfect for this kind of look, digital would be too clean.

 

I like your old photos a lot. Although so old, they look very good. Especially the blonde hair of the lady in photo 1 is really an eyecatcher.

 

best regards

Marc

Link to post
Share on other sites

To follow what I said above to Ian, I must make the comparison with a color negative and black and white with my enlarger and printing on paper to see :)

Best

Henry

Henry,

It's been quite a while since I tried colour negs in the B&W darkroom, but when I did I found the film base colour the biggest snag, exposures took ages for obvious reasons.

It was an exercise that was continually frustrating, and I gave up. B&W film is soooooo much easier, unless you can use a colour shot as well, a bit like digital I suppose.

Gary

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the fun things to try with LF cameras are paper negatives, using printing paper. This morning I did an experiment with pre-flashing the paper by making an exposure (1/4 the 'taking' exposure) with a piece of plain paper in front of the lens (this is to reduce the biting contrast of the orthochromatic paper).

 

Chamonix 10x8, Symmar-S 360/6.8, Kenthene RC glossy Gr2, Ilford MG developer, V850 scans:

 

23644341852_e850845971_c.jpg

Paper Negative #16 - no preflash by chrism229, on Flickr

 

23124684884_b896dbc254_c.jpg

Paper Negative #17 - paper preflashed by chrism229, on Flickr

 

These were actually the 5th and 6th exposures I took. The first four were attempts at guessing the exposure, using two CFT lights and one strobe. I ended up taking these two with eight exposures of one second, and during each one second exposure the flash fired twice! Obviously my guess at rating this paper at ISO12 was, umm, inaccurate, as my flash meter had indicated that a single one second exposure would do it.

 

And to go from the sublime to the ridiculous, having spent the morning at that, I was inspired to clean up and take out my wife's Pen FT this afternoon. She bought it in 1978, and it must have been ten years old then, and hasn't been used for 35 years. The negatives are sitting in some Rodinal at the moment.

 

Chris

 

Looks like a lot of fun. The preflash shot is the better. Shows off what LF is great at. Did you also make an exposurewith greater DOF?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is for my American friends...

From the 1968 opening night of the movie Cool Hand Luke...

I am sure about the specific type of Kodak film stock that this was, but it sure did hold up after nearly 40 years...

Fascinating Adam! Even for non Americans this image (and the others) makes for interesting viewing and I'm sure there is a story to tell as to their making by your father and the camera you now use.

Do tell,

Charles 

Edited by Bateleur
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hindu Temple

M6TTL, 50Lux, Portra 160

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I put more development time in the developer, it was a mistake on my part :o

So, I have the grain but I find the picture of this poppy rather pretty

And you, what do you think ? :)

 

Leica M7

MacroElmar 90

Bergger 400 Plus

Picture uncropped

 

attachicon.gif3/5/6/7/1/473965.attach

 

Thanks for commenting

Best

Henry

 

It is a very sensitive picture! In my opinion: a little piece of art!

And it doesn't even need colour, just subtile gray and shaddow !

 

Thank you, Henry, for opening this thread and posting so many great pictures!

Thanks everybody for sharing!

 

Unfortunately, most of my photos are taken with the enemy: Hasselblad.

You'll find some here: xen.photoshelter.com

 

All the best,

Xenia

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

23652354196_45243dac39_b.jpgLisbon by -Ric Capucho-

 

 

Also on Delta 100, but this time a silhouette against some very harsh daylight from inside a wonderful place in Lisbon that's basically a converted indoor vegetable and fish market... now a bustling assortment of restaurants, tables, people, noise, vibrance.

 

I showed My Dear Old Mum a few shots of the interior, and she told me that I've previously been there many times as a small boy, when it had its original function... which would have been in the late 1960s.

 

No one remembered me.

 

Ah well.

 

Ric

 

p.s. :-)

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites

23516257922_46f8538f43_b.jpgLondon by -Ric Capucho-

 

 

London! Now using Ilford Delta 100, and handheld at night with the available light. Been playing with handheld night recently to see how I might bring the ghosts out.

 

The good news is that pictures often work, and I do get interesting ghost effects.

 

The bad news is that soooooo many photos are complete throw aways.

 

Oh, and I much prefer the look, contrast and grain of Delta 100 to the XP2. It's not a question of grain size, but more of type of grain. But ISO 100 is too slow for my usual street photography, and hence my anticipated switch to HP5+ just as soon as I run down my stash of XP2.

 

Ric

Ric why not push to 400 , so you don't lose ?

Well done

Best

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a very sensitive picture! In my opinion: a little piece of art!

And it doesn't even need colour, just subtile gray and shaddow !

 

Thank you, Henry, for opening this thread and posting so many great pictures!

Thanks everybody for sharing!

 

Unfortunately, most of my photos are taken with the enemy: Hasselblad.

You'll find some here: xen.photoshelter.com

 

All the best,

Xenia

You are Welcome Xen

I just tried some rolls of Bergger just to see its capacity but my favorite film is

Kodak TX400.Thanks for your comment

Great and stunning pictures on your link and with agreement of Andreas , you can

post pictures with Hass like Adam or Chris did  :)

Best

Henry

Edited by Doc Henry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Henry,

It's been quite a while since I tried colour negs in the B&W darkroom, but when I did I found the film base colour the biggest snag, exposures took ages for obvious reasons.

It was an exercise that was continually frustrating, and I gave up. B&W film is soooooo much easier, unless you can use a colour shot as well, a bit like digital I suppose.

Gary

Gary , you are right. I prefer shoot with b&w or color and keep this line

but sometimes I converted to b&w but not often :)

Best

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ric why not push to 400 , so you don't lose ?

Well done

Best

Henry

 

Hi Henry,

 

Just beginning my experiments with pushing film.

 

I had a bit of a hiccup pushing XP2 to 1600 for nighttime shots as the results were a bit... grey. But workable, even if the film isn't very well suited to pushing, as I found out later when I read some old forum posts. So I darkened the images a couple of stops and the greyness went away... but then what's the point of pushing at all?

 

Shall try again soon with either Delta 100 or HP5+.

 

Ric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Henry,

 

Just beginning my experiments with pushing film.

 

I had a bit of a hiccup pushing XP2 to 1600 for nighttime shots as the results were a bit... grey. But workable, even if the film isn't very well suited to pushing, as I found out later when I read some old forum posts. So I darkened the images a couple of stops and the greyness went away... but then what's the point of pushing at all?

 

Shall try again soon with either Delta 100 or HP5+.

 

Ric

Ric , try it and don't forget to post here your result  :)

Great thanks

Best

Henry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...