Jump to content

Comparing Ilford to Kodak developer agitation


StS

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Some slightly idle thoughts, while the film is rinsing - Kodak recommends 5-7 agitations for five seconds every 30 seconds, Ilford recommends four agitations for 10 seconds each minute.

 

While I simply follow each manufacturer's instructions, I wonder about the difference - few and slower agitations should give slower but more uniform development, while more and faster agitations should give a better mixing of used and unused developer.

 

Most probably, each manufacturer simply set up a rule a long time ago, against which each process was set up then. Changing this recommendation would, of course, require to determine all development times from the beginning...

 

Stefan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, choose your own method of agitation that is doable and stick with it, its a datum point that helps with consistency and also helps spot problems. The Ilford method is perhaps the easiest to adopt because it gives you more time in between.

 

I have always found the Kodak times and methods very commercial and 'aggressive', more in keeping with a fast turn around lab than what people can do with more time and care at home. I would use the Digital Truth times and methods for Kodak film, which do generally go with agitation one the minute. Ilford on the other hand give times and methods more in keeping with general home use.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

They both work. I use Kodak with Kodak, Ilford with Ilford. If you want to cross over, add 10% to Ilford method. I worked it out experimentally.

 

What works well is a two reel tank with film on the bottom reel only and 8 oz of developer. Invert twice for Kodak, 4 times for ilford.

 

I never try to control contrast with agitation. Use the clock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Some slightly idle thoughts, while the film is rinsing - Kodak recommends 5-7 agitations for five seconds every 30 seconds, Ilford recommends four agitations for 10 seconds each minute.

 

While I simply follow each manufacturer's instructions, I wonder about the difference - few and slower agitations should give slower but more uniform development, while more and faster agitations should give a better mixing of used and unused developer.

 

Most probably, each manufacturer simply set up a rule a long time ago, against which each process was set up then. Changing this recommendation would, of course, require to determine all development times from the beginning...

 

Stefan

 

Dilution, agitation and developping times influence the contrast, wich depend of your enlarger i.e. brand, type, lens, with or without a condesor etc. If your results are good don't change anything.

 

Cedric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...