laglaph Posted November 13, 2012 Share #1 Â Posted November 13, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) How about this for a quality R lense solution? ALPA of Switzerland - Manufacturers of remarkable cameras - ALPA 12 FPS. You will need to go down the page a fair way. May be not the cheapest!!! Â Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveclem Posted November 13, 2012 Share #2 Â Posted November 13, 2012 It looks amazing but I'd prefer to use a camera I recognise as such. Yes, I know Alpa are precision engineers etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted November 14, 2012 Share #3 Â Posted November 14, 2012 Most of all, it would be a costly waste to buy one of the (many) supported MF digbacks just to use a 24x36 crop of it... And, notice, seems that Leica R lenses can be mounted through the Alpa-provided Canon adapter plus some of the 3rd party rings available in the market (many forum members use them with their Canons, indeed). Â Anyway, a smart exercise of hypermodularity... Ricoh (and Sinar, if still available) turn pale in comparision... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einst_Stein Posted December 29, 2012 Share #4  Posted December 29, 2012 How about this for a quality R lense solution? ALPA of Switzerland - Manufacturers of remarkable cameras - ALPA 12 FPS. You will need to go down the page a fair way. May be not the cheapest!!! Paul  If I have or want a digital back and lens system, I'd go with the Mf body. It's cheaper and better fit. Likewise, if I have a Canon lens system, I'd go with 6d or the similar.  I don't get why people want to go this route. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.