Jump to content

15mm VC Super Wide Heliar on the M9 and M6


janrzm

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've done a user report for anyone interested or thinking about using this lens on M mount cameras.

 

Including comprehensive instructions on using Cornerfix.

 

It can be found here - http://aperturepriority.co.nz/2012/05/07/15mm-voigtlander-super-wide-heliar-f4-5-asph-mk-1-3/

Link to post
Share on other sites

A really great site, and very usefull information. Great photos. Thanks for sharing.

 

My question: Have you done direct comparison on edge color problems with and without using M9 profiles before applying Cornerfix?

 

I have used Cornefix for various wides (CV15/4,5, WATE, Zeiss 18/4) on M9 and NEX-5N. I have used the no-profile option on M9 for creating profiles and post. My reasoning (that migh be wrong) is to have as much as possible original RAW files. If post-processing SW improves I will have possibility to post-process again.

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the lens on M9 (not as much as my 21/2.8 elmarit though).

The color shift is a pain. The corner fix route seems ardous. Is there anything under LR4.1 that can be as effective but less troublesome??

TIA

My CV15 mm is coded as WATE and comes out in DNG as below.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the lens on M9 (not as much as my 21/2.8 elmarit though).

The color shift is a pain. The corner fix route seems ardous. Is there anything under LR4.1 that can be as effective but less troublesome??

TIA

My CV15 mm is coded as WATE and comes out in DNG as below.

 

The only part of Cornerfix that could be described as arduous is the profile creation, it can be troublesome, but if you want to get the best out of the lens its worthwhile.

 

I'm not sure about LR4.1 having a potential solution, if one was to be found I doubt the end result would match that of Cornerfix.

 

Try using the 21mm f/2.8 Elmarit 11134 profile with the lens and see where you go from there, with my CV 15mm and M9 combination this is the profile that produces the cleanest image, by that I mean less colour shift and vignetting to correct.

 

Cheers

 

Jason

Link to post
Share on other sites

A really great site, and very usefull information. Great photos. Thanks for sharing.

 

My question: Have you done direct comparison on edge color problems with and without using M9 profiles before applying Cornerfix?

 

I have used Cornefix for various wides (CV15/4,5, WATE, Zeiss 18/4) on M9 and NEX-5N. I have used the no-profile option on M9 for creating profiles and post. My reasoning (that migh be wrong) is to have as much as possible original RAW files. If post-processing SW improves I will have possibility to post-process again.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thanks,

 

Do you mean have I compared an image with lens detection turned off all together? If so I haven't.

 

I can look at that and give you my thoughts if you like.

 

Cheers

 

Jason

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks,

 

Do you mean have I compared an image with lens detection turned off all together? If so I haven't.

 

I can look at that and give you my thoughts if you like.

 

Cheers

 

Jason

 

Yes, thats what I mean. I have done all mine with lens detection turned off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find both, the CV 12 and CV15, to be a very sweet set of lenses. Although the 12mm needs less post processing than the 15mm. If used correctly both can be a very powerful toll on the M9.

 

Great article!

 

D.

 

P.s. I only wish there was a plugin for LightRoom to make things faster and easier...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good report and really nice photos. You and other tester mention the excellent corner sharpness but I find it a bit soft at least in the extreme corners at larger apertures. I have the range finder coupled version and here is an example on the M9 at f/5.6. Look at the sign at the lower left corner for instance. I had expected it to be better but maybe I am expecting too much or could this be a bad sample? From other discussion I understand there might be a larger quality variance for CV lenses.

 

http://parsoderlund.smugmug.com/Other/Architecture/i-QCxm4T4/1/XL/L1006531CF-XL.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

The color shift is a pain. The corner fix route seems ardous. Is there anything under LR4.1 that can be as effective but less troublesome??

TIA.

 

No, but in Capture One it is a one-click correction. You shoot through a piece of white paper - once, load it into C1 as an LCC profile, and in your PP workflow hit the button to apply the LCC profile as needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...