thighslapper Posted May 17, 2012 Share #41 Â Posted May 17, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) A good reference but very boring. Â Unfortunately he employs fairly rigorous observation, logic and common sense...... Â He usually presents well reasoned and accurate arguments and only offers opinions where he is sure of his info and deductions. Â If you don't like boring then try some of the more hysterical outpourings of your New World neighbours.... yes ... you know who I mean..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 17, 2012 Posted May 17, 2012 Hi thighslapper, Take a look here Erwin Puts Blog on MM posted. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
120 Posted May 24, 2012 Share #42  Posted May 24, 2012 ... Let's divide the internet commentators in to three categories.  1) engineers / scientists sometimes with an artistic bent  2) professional photographers with tons of real life experience, who have some technical knowledge, but really aren't engineers or technical experts.  3) Bloggers  Erwin fits in category 1  No he does not have any background, or anything to do with professional engineering / optical science. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjdejong Posted May 24, 2012 Share #43 Â Posted May 24, 2012 Instead of reviewing "Erwin Puts" I am much more interested in a discussion on what he says about to the Monochrom. Â Cheers, Barend Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted May 24, 2012 Share #44 Â Posted May 24, 2012 Instead of reviewing "Erwin Puts" Â I don't know, I was looking forward to the reviews of the reviews of the reviews... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted May 24, 2012 Share #45 Â Posted May 24, 2012 I see Puts writes: Â "The sensitivity of the [MM] sensor has been increased to ISO 320." Â As I understand it (from the recent LFI article by Michael J. Hussman), this is not correct. The M9/MM sensor has a base sensitivity of 320. The apparent ISO160 base sensitivity of the M9 version of the sensor is due to the impact of the colour filters on the light captured by the sensor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 24, 2012 Share #46 Â Posted May 24, 2012 Yes - that is completely correct. For the practical result it is much of a muchness, however. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramosa Posted May 24, 2012 Share #47  Posted May 24, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) I don't read Puts much because it's too technical for me. I base my buying decision on the images of others from the same gears and how much I can justify with the wife  Great reply, one that rings true for me, too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmldds Posted May 24, 2012 Share #48 Â Posted May 24, 2012 It is nice to have reinforcing reviews from knowledgeable folks, but for me, this is a camera I have been waiting for. The reasons I had pre-ordered the camera are as follows: Â 1- Clean files at much higher ISO than my M9 2- Same as #1! Tri:) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.