jensthoes Posted October 14, 2012 Share #21 Posted October 14, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) carl yes exactly...6 min Dil B. agitating every minute for 5-6 seconds. andy ...very nice! At 100 ASA? Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Hi jensthoes, Take a look here Delta 100 and HC 110. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
andym911 Posted October 14, 2012 Author Share #22 Posted October 14, 2012 Jens yes 100 asa andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted October 15, 2012 Share #23 Posted October 15, 2012 would the results have been that much different had you used ilford chemicals instead? trying to understand the extent to which your photos, whose tonal quality is great in my opinion, is a function of picture you took (metering, etc) versus the soup with which you developed the negative. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share #24 Posted October 15, 2012 would the results have been that much different had you used ilford chemicals instead? trying to understand the extent to which your photos, whose tonal quality is great in my opinion, is a function of picture you took (metering, etc) versus the soup with which you developed the negative. The exposure was quite simple....just used averaged metering for mid tones, probably 1/30 th at 2.8. for the above shot. My view is that the HC 110 is well suited to the delta film...I always feel that the ilford chemistry gives less bite...might just be my technique but HC is my standard.. maybe others using Ilford chemistry could chip in? best andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 17, 2012 Share #25 Posted October 17, 2012 Hallo Andy, the Deltas I ordered after regarding your pictures came today (the HC was here). I'm very curious to see how it works - perhaps an lower speed alternative to my standard film (Tri-X in X-TOL 1:2 - 12 Min.). Best regards, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share #26 Posted October 18, 2012 Jens great to hear....am curious to see how you get on with it..please post an image or two. best andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted October 18, 2012 Share #27 Posted October 18, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 19, 2012 Share #28 Posted October 19, 2012 Jens great to hear....am curious to see how you get on with it..please post an image or two. best andy ...a sunny weekend (here in Germany) is near - we will see, what will pass my lenses:-) I will show some results. Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted October 19, 2012 Author Share #29 Posted October 19, 2012 jens indeed...am in Baden-Baden..sun shining:D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted October 21, 2012 Share #30 Posted October 21, 2012 These appear nice on a screen, but my experience is D76 does a better job, less grain & sharper. I mix a liter at a time and put into small one time use bottles, 4 oz generally. All I need is a few chemicals and a scale. It cost perhaps a $1 to make a liter, 8 films at 1:1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 21, 2012 Share #31 Posted October 21, 2012 Hallo, my first impression from a roll Delta 100 (M3 with Apo-Lanthar 90) on the lighttable and after first scans: - nice first impresion - good use of the sensity, - the shadows are a little weak an the lights tends easily towards pure white (perhaps the reason for the "bite"), - the middle tones are a little bit dull - could be caused by the lens a used for the test, - the grain could be I will take another roll with a lens I know well (this one was given for a test) - the Summicron DR. Pictures to come next week. Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 22, 2012 Share #32 Posted October 22, 2012 Hello, after my testing on weekend, I see, that this combination will not be my choice. No nice photo on the test roll. Nice try - but I will stay with my standard Film/Developper. Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted October 23, 2012 Author Share #33 Posted October 23, 2012 Jens what were your ' issues' with this combination? very interested to hear, as I might be happy with my stuff but maybe it can be even better? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 24, 2012 Share #34 Posted October 24, 2012 Jens what were your ' issues' with this combination? very interested to hear' date=' as I might be happy with my stuff but maybe it can be even better?[/quote'] Hello Andy, I tried to descripe the issues above. I didn't like the tonality at my photos. Too weak in the shadows, too easy blown out in the lights. I found my standard-combination (above as well) to show a richer tonality - and for me it is not so nice to shoot with 100 Asa. Like I said: Nice try! Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted October 24, 2012 Author Share #35 Posted October 24, 2012 jens thanks.....understand.. each to their own :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jensthoes Posted October 24, 2012 Share #36 Posted October 24, 2012 jensthanks.....understand.. each to their own :-) ...yes, that's true. Don't understand me wrong. It's a good combo, but not the right for me. Best, Jens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.