erl Posted January 5, 2012 Share #21 Posted January 5, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) But you did "shoot your mouth off" instead of making a diplomatic inquiry regarding how and why the restrictions are as they are. You made no attempt to understand the conventions or culture of the group. Instead you launched in into criticism. Pico, my take on this situation is that in the first place you have quoted FTI out of context where he explained in advance his position before asking the question. That's just plain rude. I'd say uber-american if I could be certain, but regardless your complaint is simply horribly uninformed or just stupid.'' My view is that perhaps on this point you need a good look in the mirror. A reminder that all opinions are acceptable, but verbal abuse of members is NOT an option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 Hi erl, Take a look here Restrictive photo posting. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
gyoung Posted January 5, 2012 Share #22 Posted January 5, 2012 So put me in your ignore file or ask that I be banned. You do have such choices. Or thicken you skin and stop acting like a victim. Your choice. . Judging by the diplomacy you would almost think Mr Pico hailed from New York rather than further West......... Gerry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted January 5, 2012 Share #23 Posted January 5, 2012 Judging by the diplomacy you would almost think Mr Pico hailed from New York rather than further West......... Gerry Gerry, I am from East of New York. (Is there something wrong with New Yorkers?) I'm from Warwick, Rhode Island. But that was over sixty years ago. I even lost my accent. (Years in England stole it from me!) I've lived all over the USA, so call me a mercurial mongrel if you must. OP wrote: Just throwing it out there. I'm sure it's a beaten horse topic, so feel free to put me in my spot. Call the dog catcher on me.. I answer to "Spot" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billib Posted January 7, 2012 Share #24 Posted January 7, 2012 I'm clearly missing something. I've posted a few (insignificant) photos and 300KB's was plenty. Lets see, images posted to a web site, probably viewed on a non-photo aware browser on an uncalibrated display. Whats the rub? More than 300 KB's is unlikely to improve images much considering all of the limitations that are likely in play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.