seaninsurrey Posted February 21, 2007 Share #1 Posted February 21, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi everyone. Last month I bought a Leica M2 with Canon 1.4/50mm and I am very pleased to say the least. I'm now looking for a 35mm lens - maybe the Canon f2. What are your thoughts on this lens and what alternatives are there for a similar price? I would buy the Canon just by the recommendations alone, but can't find one for sale anywhere! I've checked eBay but with no joy (except one which is dented). Any help would be greatly appreciated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 21, 2007 Posted February 21, 2007 Hi seaninsurrey, Take a look here 35mm lens for M2. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
andybarton Posted February 21, 2007 Share #2 Posted February 21, 2007 Congratulations on your step onto the slippery slope, and welcome to the forum! If you want a great cheapie, then find a clean 35 f 2.8 Summaron. If you find two, let me know. I sold one a couple of years ago, and wish I hadn't. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! If you have more money to spend, try to get the 35 f2 ASPH. Middle ground is an older 35 f2 non-ASPH Be aware that the 35 frame line in an M2 is a bit of a challenge if you wear spectacles.... You will get hundreds of responses to your enquiry, by the way Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! If you have more money to spend, try to get the 35 f2 ASPH. Middle ground is an older 35 f2 non-ASPH Be aware that the 35 frame line in an M2 is a bit of a challenge if you wear spectacles.... You will get hundreds of responses to your enquiry, by the way ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/16831-35mm-lens-for-m2/?do=findComment&comment=178541'>More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted February 21, 2007 Share #3 Posted February 21, 2007 There's also the Voigtlander range to consider if you don't want to pay Leica prices. They have several models from about £190 upwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodaktrix Posted February 22, 2007 Share #4 Posted February 22, 2007 I use only Canon lenses on my Ms. I can recommend the 2/35.If You are pleased with the 1,4/50 You will like the 2/35 too. There is a very good one on ebay.com which will ship worldwide. Regards Oliver Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted February 22, 2007 Share #5 Posted February 22, 2007 I agree with the idea of the Summaron 35 2,8, very good and light: in Italy (and Europe in general) one can find good items for 400 to 600 Euros depending on cosmetics and accessories (hood, container...) the 3,5 version costs less but not as good to use and even more difficult to find in the version for M2 ("no spectacles"). Classic Summicrons 35 (non asph, of course) are usually priced 25% 30% more than Summarons 2,8 and are easy to find. Do not know if these prices are so much higher tha Canon 35s: thik is anyway a pity to have an M2 a not one Leitz lens... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodaktrix Posted February 23, 2007 Share #6 Posted February 23, 2007 Luigi, the Canon 2/35 goes for 200-300 Euros on ebay.de I had the Summaron 2,8/35 on an M3 in use for years, and I must say it is a very bad performer compared to the Canon 2/35. The Canon is much sharper, has a better contrast and is absolutely flare resistant. To my mind it can compete with any of the pre aspherical 35mm Summicrons. 3 or 4 years ago I did a direct comparison of my Canon 1,4/50 to a then new 2/50 Summicron. At F2 to F5,6 there was no difference in sharpness and contrast, but the Summicron had star shape reflections in spot light sources, the Canon had none. Regards Oliver Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
seaninsurrey Posted February 24, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted February 24, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi - thanks for your reply. I couldn't find the item on eBay. Do you have the number? Many thanks in advance! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeplanter Posted February 24, 2007 Share #8 Posted February 24, 2007 The Canon is much sharper, has a better contrast and is absolutely flare resistant. To my mind it can compete with any of the pre aspherical 35mm Summicrons. I, too, own the Canon 35/2 and agree with you that it is a sharp, contrasty lens, even wide-open. But to be fair, I also have to say that It has some of the most terrible bokeh I've ever seen in 35mm lens. OOF highlights look like donut rings, almost to the point of resembling a mirror lens. I rarely use the Canon 35/2 aymore, just so for this reason. Jim Bielecki Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjans Posted February 24, 2007 Share #9 Posted February 24, 2007 quote " There's also the Voigtlander range to consider if you don't want to pay Leica prices. They have several models from about £190 upwards. " I use the Voigtländer Ultron 1.7 / 35 mm and I'm pleased with the results considering the price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summicron Posted February 25, 2007 Share #10 Posted February 25, 2007 How does the 35mm Summiux (pre-asph) stack up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodaktrix Posted February 26, 2007 Share #11 Posted February 26, 2007 Jim, I never had reason to complain about the "bokeh", and as far as I remember I have never noticed "donuts". But I rarely use that lens wide open, most between F4 to F8. Regards Oliver Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountaineer-American Posted February 27, 2007 Share #12 Posted February 27, 2007 I like the M2 quite a lot & use it with Summaron 1:35 in f/2.8. It is not as sharp as newer lenses but with Tri-X the photographs have a "look" that is quite pleasing, particularly to older viewers. Don't start vast projects with half-vast ideas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted February 27, 2007 Share #13 Posted February 27, 2007 The 35 pre ASPH is low contrast wide open and soft. It improves on closing. Early ones took E41 filters. Later required a ser VII filter in a special vented hood that split revealing a filter grove. The shade is expensive and rare. The regular 35/50 vented hood can be used without filters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
seaninsurrey Posted March 3, 2007 Author Share #14 Posted March 3, 2007 Well, I couldn't find a decent Canon 35/f2, so I'm now considering taking the plunge and buying a Summicron 35/2 non-asph (4th). What are your opinions of this lens, how much should I pay and do you know of any in-depth reviews? Thanks again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spydrxx Posted March 4, 2007 Share #15 Posted March 4, 2007 The Summaron 2.8 was my first M lens in the late 1960s and it was a stellar performer...I've always regretted selling it in spite of now using the most recent 35 Summicron. I doubt that you'll be disappointed with any 35mm Leica or Canon lens you get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
seaninsurrey Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share #16 Posted March 4, 2007 Well, in the end I bought a Voigtländer Ultron 1.7 / 35. The Canon 2 / 35 was impossible to find, especially in good condition and the Summicrons are just a bit too expensive for me! Can't wait for it to arrive and hope that I'll be pleased with the results. Thanks for the input everyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
treeplanter Posted March 4, 2007 Share #17 Posted March 4, 2007 I never had reason to complain about the "bokeh", and as far as I remember I have never noticed "donuts". But I rarely use that lens wide open, most between F4 to F8. Not to hijack this thread, but the attached is a shot taken with the Canon 35/2.0 wide-open. Note the donut-shaped highlights in the background. Some folks, like me, find this to be annoying, Excuse the light leak. I load my own film (Efke 25) and this was the last shot on the roll. Jim Bielecki Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/16831-35mm-lens-for-m2/?do=findComment&comment=189720'>More sharing options...
jerchy Posted March 4, 2007 Share #18 Posted March 4, 2007 I have a summaron f3.5 with "eyes" for an M3 and this should work with M2 by simply popping off the "eyes". The f3.5 max aperture is not much different from the f2.8. You can probably find one on eBay for about $ 200.00 then sell off the "eyes" to another buyer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
think Posted March 4, 2007 Share #19 Posted March 4, 2007 If I were looking to purchase another 35/2 M lens based on cost/performance criteria my first choice would be the Zeiss ZM Biogon. If I wanted something faster the VC 35/1.2 would be high on the list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Mitchell Posted March 6, 2007 Share #20 Posted March 6, 2007 Another nice option is the Canon 35/1.8 in LTM. It's less expensive than most of these lenses and has a great signature. I keep it on my M2 most of the time now--especially when traveling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.