Jump to content

8mm Fish-eye on an M9


billib

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Until I get a chance to use the Novoflex adapter, I'll blame the

cheap adapter instead of the lens. Before y'all schooled me

I was leaning toward the 8mm as being the problem. The

exposure is a bit dark for what I had set also. Can't blame

the adapter for that.....heck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How sharp is your lens if the best f-stop is used? Just how sharp is "perfectly sharp"?

Well, umm ... okay, "perfectly" sharp maybe is an exaggeration. At the optimal f-stop (i. e. f/11 for my lens), sharpness at infinity isn't really perfect but it's perfectly usable for pictorial work. See the samples below, taken today. All images have been developed in Camera Raw 6.5. I removed some significant lateral chromatic aberration (R/C -50; B/Y -5) and applied some capture sharpening (Amount 35; Radius 0.8; Detail 65; Mask 35). Black surrounding cropped to square in Photoshop. Downsized to web size using resampling method "Bicubic sharper"; no output sharpening applied beyond that.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Leica M9, Minolta MD Fisheye Rokkor 7.5 mm 1:4 on Novoflex adapter, f/11, ISO 160/23°.

How NOT to use a fisheye lens—or you'll get boring images like this one. This is supposed to be a test shot, to show sharpness at far-away subjects with this fix-focus fisheye lens. The focus is pre-set to 1.2 m/4 ft, so infinity sharpness entirely relies on depth-of-field. Note that I stood right between the two trees!

 

The next two images are crops from the image above (and from another taken at f/5.6).

 

 

 

Leica M9, Minolta MD Fisheye Rokkor 7.5 mm 1:4 on Novoflex adapter, f/5.6, ISO 160/23°. Center crop.

 

 

 

 

Leica M9, Minolta MD Fisheye Rokkor 7.5 mm 1:4 on Novoflex adapter, f/11, ISO 160/23°. Center crop.

 

 

 

And now for an image that shows how a circular-image fisheye lens is supposed to be used in pictorial work. Look for unusual perspectives and have lots of things going on at all distances within your frame ... umm, circle. For this shot, the camera laid flat on its back under the tree with the lens pointing upward, firing the shutter using the self-timer while I was hiding behind the tree trunk. The two ladies at the image's 6 o'clock and 7 o'clock positions were photographing each other and didn't notice that I photographed them, too—after all, my camera was pointing up that tree ...

 

 

 

Leica M9, Minolta MD Fisheye Rokkor 7.5 mm 1:4 on Novoflex adapter, f/11, ISO 160/23°.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW, you went waaaaay beyond what I had expected.

I can see now that some compromises must be made when

designing lenses like this. I sort of expected your shots to be

just a tad sharper. I haven't used my 8mm in years, no, decades.

I find shots, such as yours, inspire me to use the Fish-eye more.

 

I just remember the Nikkor as being sharper than the way it now

appears. I guess the Leica is so unforgiving as well as digital in

generalI, nothing can hide. I lost all of my photo's in a flood, so I

can't check them for quality.

 

I said " I " nine times.......oop's ten.......eleven. Oh my!

 

Your shots were a big help,,,,,,,thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OT insofar as it's a full-frame fisheye, not circular image:

 

Graham Watson, who shoots the Tour de France every year, gets very good mileage out of his 10.5 mm Nikkor by finding images where the lens' distortion blends with the subject, keeping the attention on the subject and not the lens.

 

Specific examples from 2006 at Apple - Pro - Profiles - Graham Watson, Tour de France Gallery are:

Stage 1, image 1

Stage 2, image 1

Stage 16, image 1

 

More info at :: GrahamWatson.com :: Graham Watson Cycling Photography ::.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, full-frame fisheye lenses—i. e. 15 - 16 mm for 35-mm format; 10 - 10.5 mm for APS-C format—are better and easier to use for pictorial work than circular-image fisheye lenses. The latter are mostly useful for scientific, industrial, or surveillance applications but rarely for pictorial work. However those who create 3D panoramas often find circular-image fisheye lenses useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Here is a shot taken with a Zenitar 16mm rectilinear fish eye on the M240. No alterations apart from conversion with ACR 7.4, a tweak on exposure and resizing in PS CS6. The patio at the bottom of the image is actually a straight line. When my wife saw the photo, she said: "Oh that looks quite good. I wish we had built it in a curve"

 

Wilson

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...