Peter H Posted June 23, 2011 Share #21 Posted June 23, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) If the file quality at 160 can be improved, I'd find that far more tempting. I have no problem whatsoever with the current file quality by the way, just that if anything should be improved I'd like it to be the ultimate, best quality potential, which will be at the native sensitivity of the sensor as I understand it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 23, 2011 Posted June 23, 2011 Hi Peter H, Take a look here Great high ISO key to next digital M. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Xmas Posted June 23, 2011 Share #22 Posted June 23, 2011 Really? Lost interest now. Can we have more pictures of the ladies on roller-skates please? Regards, Bill Hi Bill No more photos of ladies on skates they are way too nice. Noel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted June 24, 2011 Share #23 Posted June 24, 2011 As with so many polls, it's not possible to state my preferences because, for example, a better LCD and sapphire glass - both of which I would like - and better high ISO performance are not mutually exclusive whereas higher resolution and faster image processing may be/probably are. I would like better high ISO performance not because I want to take pictures in the near-dark but because I would like noise free images. I would also like a better LCD and faster image processing. I don't need more pixels. It's a pity Leica see the only cover glass option as being sapphire glass which is certainly expensive. A good benchmark for LCD quality/cover durability for me would be the iPhone 4. Nikon DLSRs got a big lift when they moved from the horrible D2x display to the current D3 and while many here would dismiss the benefit of a better display, it lags a long way behind the D3, and that camera is now, what, nearly 4 years old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted June 24, 2011 Share #24 Posted June 24, 2011 No more photos of ladies on skates they are way too nice. Depends on whether you like your women with massive thighs... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ash Posted June 24, 2011 Share #25 Posted June 24, 2011 It's a pity Leica see the only cover glass option as being sapphire glass which is certainly expensive. A good benchmark for LCD quality/cover durability for me would be the iPhone 4.. Hm, my iphone has one long deep scratch which I would not like to have on my camera. Further the display is independently broken twice. One of them I have taped as it ends in the home button. Regards, Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted June 24, 2011 Share #26 Posted June 24, 2011 As with so many polls, it's not possible to state my preferences because, for example, a better LCD and sapphire glass - both of which I would like - and better high ISO performance are not mutually exclusive whereas higher resolution and faster image processing may be/probably are. I set up the poll to reflect the op's questions Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.