mitchell Posted January 31, 2007 Share #1 Posted January 31, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Used my new Really Right Stuff Ball Head 25 on my old Gitzo 1227 tripod. Great ball head. 10 degrees Fahrenheit today. Very nice to have a lever clamp, and just one simple knob to tighten when using gloves, and in this case kneeling under a low footbridge. Small, solid and smooth ball. Almost perfect for an M. Only disadvantage, no panning if you want to knit more than one shot together for a panarama. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best, Mitchell Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Best, Mitchell ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/14914-really-right-stuff-ball-head-25-on-m8/?do=findComment&comment=157656'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 31, 2007 Posted January 31, 2007 Hi mitchell, Take a look here Really Right Stuff Ball Head 25 on M8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
carstenw Posted January 31, 2007 Share #2 Posted January 31, 2007 I have the same head and find the lubrication a little lacking. When I tighten it, it doesn't happen totally smoothly, but jerks a little. Do you have this problem too? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchell Posted January 31, 2007 Author Share #3 Posted January 31, 2007 Carsten, I hadn't noticed this, but I checked after reading your post, and yes there is some jerkiness. It seems to be in only some areas of the ball, and by rotating the clamp I can avoid most of it. Not a problem for me so far. Best, Mitchell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted January 31, 2007 Share #4 Posted January 31, 2007 The problem is that it shifts a little. I like the ballhead, but I am less thrilled with it than I thought I would be, after hearing reports of the 40 and 55. I also find its tiny base makes it hard to use in portrait mode on a tripod with a normal, larger base, since the camera or quick-release plate hits. Perhaps I just need to go to a 40, but that is much heavier. This was all meant to be a travelling setup for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzav Posted January 31, 2007 Share #5 Posted January 31, 2007 I use both the BH-55 and BH-40 on Gitzo tripods. The BH-40 LR is mounted on a G1227 MK2 and is an extremely stable yet very light shooting platform. I use it for location work with a DSLR and lenses up to a 180 f2.8 without any signs of shakiness. It is an ideal combination for the M8 also. The only smaller support that I use for the M8 is an early version Leitz table tripod and ballhead combination. This is much smaller than the more recent larger table tripod and ballhead from Leica which I also had but sold in favor of the older, more compact version. The two RRS ballheads have been very smooth with positive locking. The BH-40 seems to be a perfect match to the Gitzo 1227 and is far better than anything Gitzo has for that tripod. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wparsonsgisnet Posted January 31, 2007 Share #6 Posted January 31, 2007 Mitchell, that is an absolutely stunning picture. The colors and the coolness of the ice are awe inspiring. I wish I had a winter picture like that in my portfolio! Regards, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchell Posted January 31, 2007 Author Share #7 Posted January 31, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Bill, Thanks so much. You've made my day! I noticed while posting that there is a blurring at the edges of the image. I think this was caused by a little tilt/crop I did for horizon correction in Raw Developer. I emailed them about it. Carsten, I find no movement at all once I tighten the lever knob. But, the lever knob does hit the plastic of the platform of the Gitzo so it limits how hard I can tighten it. This hasn't been a problem for me, but perhaps you are not able to tighten the lever knob enough. I wonder if you could unscrew the lever knob, and rotate it so it allows you to tighten it more. I think a call or email to Really Right Stuff might help. I think this is a very solid unit that should not shift. A smaller base on the Gitzo would be nice. I wonder if there's something suitable? Nick, I have the BH 55 which I use with my DMR. It's great! But, I'm happy with the simplicity and light weight of the 25 for the M8. Best, Mitchell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzav Posted January 31, 2007 Share #8 Posted January 31, 2007 Mitchell, Try pulling the lever out from the ballhead (it is spring loaded) and simply reposition it to any angle you want and it should lock in; that is how it works on the BH-40 and should do the same on the BH-25. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted January 31, 2007 Share #9 Posted January 31, 2007 Mitchell, the lever can be pulled out and re-positioned. There is a spring in there. I find the 40+Gitzo 1258 and so on much too large. I was originally looking at the Gitzo 1057+25, as a travelling kit. I don't use tripods much, and when I travel, I need to keep my entire kit, including camera and tripod, clothes, and everything, to 10kg. That is a pretty tough requirement, but enables me to take my luggage on-board, and then to hike anywhere I want, including deserts, mountains, and so on. I thought about the Gitzo 1158T, I think it is called. The "traveller" version. Slightly larger and heavier, but very compact, since the top folds into the gap between the legs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe S Posted January 31, 2007 Share #10 Posted January 31, 2007 My 25 is very smooth in all positions and I find it to perfectly match the camera size. I have it screwed directly to the center column on a Gitzo 1228 with the column base plate removed. I use it with the universal L plate and quick release. Fits perfect in carry on luggage. I had an Arca for my larger cameras but found it and the larger RRS heads cumbersome in this new world of high resolution small, light cameras. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted January 31, 2007 Share #11 Posted January 31, 2007 Base plate removed? Ah, I had no idea that one could do this. I will test the G1057 and see if that works on it too, and in that case, buy it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.