Jump to content

Fun comparison X1/M9


Mr_Jones

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The m9 picture is at bottom, it looks again much better then X1. I thought the difference wont be that big but the M9 picture looks more like real life, sharpness,contrast,colors, the x1 in comparison looks a bit dull. But i wont buy an M9, its just to much for somebody who take a picture once in a month or two, even the x1 is to much. But it would be interesting to see OOC jpeg with saturation highest,contrast highest, sharpness high etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The m9 picture is at bottom, it looks again much better then X1. I thought the difference wont be that big but the M9 picture looks more like real life, sharpness,contrast,colors, the x1 in comparison looks a bit dull. But i wont buy an M9, its just to much for somebody who take a picture once in a month or two, even the x1 is to much. But it would be interesting to see OOC jpeg with saturation highest,contrast highest, sharpness high etc..

 

Thanks Danielsan, I'm not sure I would agree about the M9 pics looking more lifelike, I think they are already OOC with highest settings. I can say with some confidence that they are not the closest to reality in this case. Although they may still be the better looking.

 

I'm attaching an unaltered version from the X1, and an extreme contrast version. The first one although dull is closer to real life.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Mr Jones, did you manually focus the X1 for the air-to-ground shot?

 

Yes manual focus at infinity, and setting exposure and shutter speed to favour a faster shutter. The air to ground shot is f4.0 exp 1/500. The M9 was f16 exp /60, I believe he was shooting a small aperture to increase focal depth but there are obviously problems with camera movement in those conditions.

 

I'm attaching a flat version of the original raw from the x1 which clearly looks like it was taken through perspex, however there is much less contrast and saturation.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Jones,

 

I hope you do not take offense at me taking liberty at tweaking your X1 photo just for fun....I can only do so much with that small file but here's the version I came out with, not sure how it looks on everyone else's screen ....

 

These comparisons are fun, whether they mean anything or not!

 

CJ

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offense, I will mail you the raw file if you pm me, as I would be interested to see what you come up with. The version you have already posted looks fine on my screen, kind of between the original and the first one I posted. I will have another look.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

That one is much better i think, the two original X1 pictures looked always kind of milky, i cant explain it.

 

I agree they do look hazy, but it was a very misty cloudy morning.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a second look and it does look good, seems to bring out some detail in the smaller waterfalls and I like the green. I would be happy to send you the original.

 

Hey Mr Jones,

 

Sent you a PM already.:)

 

I'll be most happy to try and tweak your photo...

 

Thanks,

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Enhanced" reality on pictures is usually more attractive and preferable to us. However, real is real. To my eyes, X1's pictures look closer to the reality than those from M8, M8.2, M9, X100 and the other compact cameras I've ever used. It's one of the reasons why I like it so much.

 

I know I'm boring...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Often, when there is someone who dares to compare an M9 with another camera is violating a taboo. Why not? I think the pictures show nicely that the difference between the picture quality is (in that example, size and way of presentation) marginal. But sure it is no argument against an M9, but a good argument for an X1 IMHO, because for about quarter of price one get maybe - let´s say 80-90 percent of the Image quality of the expensive one.

The rest is a matter of personal taste.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas,

 

I couldnt agree more. In fact it is usually the case where we have to pay a few times more for a marginal increase (sometimes only a few percent) in Image quality. The X1 is also marginally better in image quality than say the GXR only but the price difference is huge.

 

I have a digilux 2 and it wont start now ( having not been used much in 3 years). You just reminded me, I need to bring it in for servicing. This has happened once several years ago was a minor fix, I hope the same this time round.

 

CJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Andy,

 

here's a downsized version of what I sent to you. Just a few quick sliders in PS Elements.

 

I noticed that there was probably a fair bit of mist/fine water spray so the dng was looking hazy.

 

Let me know what you think of the full-sized jpeg which I emailed you. I downsized it and it looks considerably poorer here.

 

CJ

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...