Jump to content

Initial Telyt Production Years


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I was interested in finding out the initial production years of all Telyt types.

According to Erwin Puts http://www.imx.nl/photo/downloads/files/page70-leicapocket_pod1.pdf one finds:

 

Year From # __ Total To # ___ Lens ______ 1: f#

1935 _.272.001 1000 _.273.000 ____Telyt__ 45 200

1936 _.332.001 __50 _.332.050 ____Telyt__ 50 400

1961 1.850.001 1000 1.851.000 ____Telyt__ 48 280

1966 2.212.101 _200 2.212.300 ____Telyt__ 56 400

1966 2.212.301 _200 2.212.500 ____Telyt__ 56 560

1967 2.239.001 1000 2.240.000 ____Telyt__ 56 200

1967 2.242.001 __50 2.242.050 ____Telyt__ 68 400

1969 2.371.801 _500 2.372.300 ____Telyt__ 40 200

1970 2.406.001 1000 2.407.000 ____Telyt-R 40 250

1970 2.411.041 __20 2.411.060 ____Telyt__ 68 560

1970 2.411.061 ___1 2.411.061 ____Telyt-S 63 800

1975 2.748.631 1000 2.749.630 Apo-Telyt-R 34 180

1979 2.991.151 __50 2.991.200 ____Telyt-R 48 350

1980 3.067.301 1000 3.068.300 MR-Telyt-R 80 500

1983 3.280.401 1000 3.281.400 Apo-Telyt-R 28 280

1987 3.445.901 __20 3.445.920 Apo-Telyt-R 28 400

1990 3.532.296 _172 3.532.467 ____Telyt-R 68 400

1993 3.621.833 _500 3.622.332 Apo-Telyt-R 40 280

1995 3.729.151 __70 3.729.220 Apo-Telyt-R 400/560/800

1995 3.729.221 __70 3.729.290 Apo-Telyt-R 280/400/560

1998 3.838.125 _500 3.838.624 Apo-Telyt-M 34 135

2003 3.973.736 ___3 3.973.738 Apo-Telyt-R 56 1600

 

• What would be a ranking order in terms of optical performance of all

the Telyts that can be focused to infinity on an M9 + VisoFlex III?

 

• Which Telyt including Telyt-R would perform best when adapted to a Nikon camera?

I understand that there can be different versions of the same Telyt type.

 

Thanks, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... fine questions... :o: what I can tell you is based on my own experiences on film and, later, M8 + Viso :

 

400 : I have all the 4 version and imho the better is the f 5,6, both in image quality (at center) and handling (though the 6,8 is lighter, but I prefer the Televit to the shoulder support of the 6,8); Same applies to 560 (have both the 5,6 and 6,8); indeed, to be realistic, the question of handling is someway not so important... truth is that with a M+Viso, tripod is often a must, with such focals.

 

200 : f4 better than 4,5, but little difference at "normal" f stops like f8 if the 4,5 is (as mine) of the postwar coated version.

 

280... much discussed recently... ;) : no doubt about V3 as the best.

 

Within some weeks, I'll be able to say something about the 800 6,3 on M8+Viso III... :), and if you find one of the 3 items of the cheap 1600, let us know... :D

 

I have no experience at all with R cameras... but think that the last modular Apo Telyt R are of another league : I think that our member and excellent wildlife photographer Doug Herr could say something about (if I remember well, he posted some of his splendid pictures in the forum, time to time).

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D...Quite clearly the newer APO objectives 4/280mm and Modul R 280/400/560 ;)

 

I like the 6,8/400mm a lot on my DMR, the problematic edge areas are not so visible any more and in the middle it is first-class!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

regards,

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

R8/DMR/560(6.8)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... fine questions... :o: what I can tell you is based on my own experiences on film and, later, M8 + Viso :

 

400 : I have all the 4 version and imho the better is the f 5,6, both in image quality (at center) and handling (though the 6,8 is lighter, but I prefer the Televit to the shoulder support of the 6,8); Same applies to 560 (have both the 5,6 and 6,8); indeed, to be realistic, the question of handling is someway not so important... truth is that with a M+Viso, tripod is often a must, with such focals.

 

200 : f4 better than 4,5, but little difference at "normal" f stops like f8 if the 4,5 is (as mine) of the postwar coated version.

 

280... much discussed recently... ;) : no doubt about V3 as the best.

 

Within some weeks, I'll be able to say something about the 800 6,3 on M8+Viso III... :), and if you find one of the 3 items of the cheap 1600, let us know... :D

 

I have no experience at all with R cameras... but think that the last modular Apo Telyt R are of another league : I think that our member and excellent wildlife photographer Doug Herr could say something about (if I remember well, he posted some of his splendid pictures in the forum, time to time).

 

 

Hi Luigi,

 

Many thanks. Starting with the Telyt 200/4. Mine is from 1961. It also seems to work just fine on bellows.

When my M9 was in Solms, I had to fall back on using a Nikon D3 for use with the Telyts.

 

Here are two images from that combination:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Luigi,

 

Continuing with the 280/4.8 v2 on D3 (I am still waiting to get my v3 back):

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

and with bellows:

 

With regards to the 400, I am not familiar with 400/5 but have 400/5.6 and 400/6.8.

The Televits are certainly fun. Haven't gotten too much attention yet when using them.

On the 400/5.6 I seem to be noticing the curvature more than on the 400/6.8 so have been preferring the later. I need to use both Telyts more.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

:D...Quite clearly the newer APO objectives 4/280mm and Modul R 280/400/560 ;)

 

I like the 6,8/400mm a lot on my DMR, the problematic edge areas are not so visible any more and in the middle it is first-class!

 

[ATTACH]243361[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]243362[/ATTACH]

 

regards,

Jan

 

 

Hi Jan,

 

Many thanks. Those are certainly stunning images.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

R8/DMR/560(6.8)

 

Hi JC,

 

Many thanks for the spectacular image. What bird is that?

 

So far I have been missing out on the Telyt 560s.

I have the impression that 400 and 560 were/are sometimes being sold as a combo.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...