Jump to content

Leica X1 vs Sigma DP2S


colonel

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

hi,

any had both and can compare/contrast ?

 

I want a light APS-C sensor camera with 30-50mm 35mm equiv high quality lens

 

My summary, from reading and looking is that:

 

1. Both well made in metal, but Leica better made and looks much nicer

2. Both slow in usage. Sigma slightly faster ?

3. Both good up to 800 ISO. Leica significantly better above ISO 800

4. Better software - With the leica you get lightroom free

5. 2.0 software from Leica looks to speed things up, no signs of new Sigma software

6. Boths lenses very good. Main difference ?

 

any comments, etc. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

boxedlight is interesting

 

Its interesting that I am told the lens on the X1 is superb. Looking at Leica lens costs, the whole camera is around the cost of the equivalent leica M lens.

 

An odd though crossed my mind. If leica brought out a x1-20mm and a x1-70mm its worth buying the three cameras for my kit bag rather then an M9 and three lenses ...

 

ho hum. much to think about

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

any had both and can compare/contrast ?

 

I want a light APS-C sensor camera with 30-50mm 35mm equiv high quality lens

 

My summary, from reading and looking is that:

 

1. Both well made in metal, but Leica better made and looks much nicer

2. Both slow in usage. Sigma slightly faster ?

3. Both good up to 800 ISO. Leica significantly better above ISO 800

4. Better software - With the leica you get lightroom free

5. 2.0 software from Leica looks to speed things up, no signs of new Sigma software

6. Boths lenses very good. Main difference ?

 

any comments, etc. ?

 

The X1 is infinitely better at 1600 and 3200 ISO because the Sigma caps at 800.

 

There is a lot of info at the Dpreview sigma forum that may be helpful. For what it's worth there seems to be a pretty fair number of folks who have mechanical trouble with the extending lens on the Sigma.

 

With the Nex as an option at a lower price I don't see the purpose of the Sigma at this point. Leica offers a "luxury" product with top image quality, at a luxury price. The Sony is a great second alternative for the bargain hunters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have bought the DP1S (28 mm eq). I have to be very patient, that is true.

The lens is very good, but f/4 is slow too.

One should use RAW, but the developer software SPP is very good (but also slow).

Somehow one cannot understand the complaints, that the X1 is slow.

It is a nice companion to my Dlux-4.

Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

An odd though crossed my mind. If leica brought out a x1-20mm and a x1-70mm its worth buying the three cameras for my kit bag rather then an M9 and three lenses ...

 

Colonel,

I agree. My wish too.

Luitenant Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...