Jump to content

Coding a Nokton 35mm f1.4?


mgc2010

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Please forgive me if this has been dealt with in some past threads.

 

I'm so new to the Leica scene that I haven't even bought one yet but the ferry is booked for a trip to Inverness tomorrow to purchase an M8. The lens which I intend to get at the same time is a new Nokton 35mm f1.4.

 

Is it necessary/advisable to have it coded for use on the M8?

 

I have an opportunity to get a mint secondhand Summarit 35/2 from the same dealer. What is the concensus of opinion in choosing between the 2 lenses?

 

Your advice would be very much appreciated before I part with my hard earned cash.

 

Regards

Colin

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

There's no such thing as a 35mm f/2 Summarit: if it's f/2 it's a Summicron, if it's a Summarit it's f/2.5.

 

Either way, assuming it is in good order, it'll be a better general purpose lens than the 35mm f/1.4 Nokton. The Nokton is much faster, but it isn't very sharp at the widest apertures and also suffers from focus shift as you stop down from f/1.4, which makes it difficult to place the plane of sharpest focus just where you need it. (Evidence that the Nokton is something of an expert's lens: it's made in two versions, with conventional multi-coating and old-fashioned single-layer coating respectively.)

 

For a 35mm lens on an M8, coding is (in my experience) desirable but definitely not essential.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess from your advice the leica glass always wins.

 

Not every time, even when money is no object. And the 35mm f/1.4 Nokton isn't a bad lens, just not quite as good for general photography as the Summarit - especially if you're new to Leicas.

 

I didn't mention this before because time was short, but there's a lot of excellent information on rangefinder photography, including detailed reviews and comparisons of various lenses, at http://www.reidreviews.com. It's a subscription site, but many people here - me included - think it well worth the money.

 

I hope you really enjoy the M8!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks All for your valuable advice. I collected my M8 yesterday and I'm already delighted with the few images which I've snapped on the way home. The two 35mm lenses were sold before I reached but I managed to pick up a good 50mm pre-asph summicron. A little long for my general purpose use but very handy all the same.

 

Now for some fun!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please forgive me if this has been dealt with in some past threads.

 

I'm so new to the Leica scene that I haven't even bought one yet but the ferry is booked for a trip to Inverness tomorrow to purchase an M8. The lens which I intend to get at the same time is a new Nokton 35mm f1.4.

 

Is it necessary/advisable to have it coded for use on the M8?

 

I have an opportunity to get a mint secondhand Summarit 35/2 from the same dealer. What is the concensus of opinion in choosing between the 2 lenses?

 

Your advice would be very much appreciated before I part with my hard earned cash.

 

Regards

Colin

 

Hi Colin

 

If, or when, you get a Nokton or other VC lens, it's easy to code those that have a groove running round the mont by placing a sticky white label on the mount in the correct place, press down with a fingernail to ensure adhesion, then trim with a surgical scalpel so that the only part of the label remaining is that which is stuck inside he groove.

 

You then mark with a sharpie pen, according to Bo's template at BoPhoto.com: M8 coder - simple manual handcoding of M lenses

 

Or pop over here if you're not sure.:)

 

Cheers

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...