Hacker Posted August 13, 2010 Share #21 Posted August 13, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hacker, thanks for your comments and images. You mention the 28 2.8 ASPH, and I have an older 28 2.0 ASPH (which has delightful contrast too). I am curious, since you suggest an overall rating: do you also have the 135 APO and can make a comparison with the 28 2.8 that you compare to the 18 SE? By transitive inference, it sounds like the 18 SE is as contrasty as the 135 APO, which I find to be just extraordinary (even if it is not so easy to use). What lens did you use for the two-shot you just posted below your M8? So you still use both an M8 and an M9? How do you decide between the two? I noted that michael_b_elmer, who shares our tastes in glass, clearly prefers the M9. The 135 APO is a great lens, and I had great difficulty focusing corectly on the M8 and M8.2. All other lenses worked properly. I almost sold it until I tried it on the M9. It works perfectly. M9 over previous models. No UV/IR filters. The number of UV/IR filters I had were more than the camera itself. Go figure..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Hi Hacker, Take a look here Comments about 18 SE vs 21 SX ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.