Jump to content

M9 and WATE


lanetomlane

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I've decided to bite the bullet and part exchange one of my M8's for an M9. I just wondered if anyone has had any issues in using the WATE with the M9.

 

I apologise if there is information on the forum but when I did a search there seemed to be a lot relating to the M9 and MATE but I couldn't find much on the WATE.

 

Thanks in advance for any comments or advise anyone is able to share.

______________________________

Regards, Tom

 

 

 

 

Photography by Tom Lane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tom, have both.

 

issues ? none I can see...

 

theres a bit of vigneting and a bit of corner coloring, but just a tad.

 

remember NOT to use UV-IR with the WATE on the M9, otherwise you do get SERIOUS vignetting and funky colors.

 

On the M9, its REALLY wide and really sharp. Enjoy the combo !

Link to post
Share on other sites

>> Tom

 

The WATE works well on the M9.

 

No colourfringing at all, at least I have seen nothing of this nature so far.

The results come out very well, a handy travel outfit not only for landscapes,

townscapes etc.

 

But you should only consider the lens together with the special finder. Using

seperate finders will force you to constantly switch from one finder to

another. And the bubble to get horizontal horizons, i. e., is a must with

this short lens.

 

Best

GEORG

 

-------------------------------

I´ll try to find a sample photo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go,

 

taken with the WATE, set on 21 mm, f 4,0 and the focus was 0,5 m

 

Best

GEORG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another one with the WATE,

 

handheld with the aid of the BUBBLE ...

 

 

Best

GEORG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to both of you for your positive comments and particularly to Georg for kindly posting the excellent photographs.

____________________________

Kind regards, Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Tom,

 

There have been many instances of praise on this Forum for the WATE on the M9.

 

It has become my travel lens of choice, and I have not suffered any red edges or CA.

 

The WATE is also very good for panorama's, and I invite you to look at my New Zealand Galleries on Zenfolio | Sander van Hulsenbeek Photography : most are done with the WATE, and several just handheld (in portrait-view).

 

I now use the Leica 18mm finder. Dear but small and clear. The 18mm frame is, well, for 18mm. For 16 mm I uses the full view of the finder, and for 21 mm the outside of the 24 lines of the M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom,

 

There have been many instances of praise on this Forum for the WATE on the M9.

 

It has become my travel lens of choice, and I have not suffered any red edges or CA.

 

The WATE is also very good for panorama's, and I invite you to look at my New Zealand Galleries on Zenfolio | Sander van Hulsenbeek Photography : most are done with the WATE, and several just handheld (in portrait-view).

 

I now use the Leica 18mm finder. Dear but small and clear. The 18mm frame is, well, for 18mm. For 16 mm I uses the full view of the finder, and for 21 mm the outside of the 24 lines of the M8.

 

 

 

Wow, Sander, the panorama shots are very impressive. If I may ask what software do you use to do the stitching?

 

I have the MATE and WATE and find them a superb combination for travelling. I used to use the MATE on M6's (plus of course the M8) but have never tried the WATE on anything full frame, hence my question.

 

Many thanks for your kind response.

__________________________

Regards, Tom

 

 

 

 

Photography by Tom Lane

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom,

 

I use PtGui Pro ( Panorama image software - PTGui ) , which looks simple but in advanced mode is very powerfull. In my experience a lot of pano's can be successfully made handheld, but when close-up subjects or important fore-ground ( Via Appia Antica) and sharp as well as straight horizons are involved (seascapes) a tripod with a nodalpoint setup is indispensable The Nodal Ninja 3MkII is small and supports the M9 plus WATE excellently: Nodal Ninja Panoramic Tripod Heads etc.

 

More on the M9 plus WATE: also excellent for HDR! See

Zenfolio | Sander van Hulsenbeek Photography | Antique Rome

Zenfolio | Sander van Hulsenbeek Photography | Rome 2010

(both handheld, 5 bracketed exposures)

Link to post
Share on other sites

on my pro website (not flicker) there are pictures taken with the WATE on M9. Interiors.

Maybe it can help.

 

 

Many thanks for your kind response Piero. I had a look on your website and was very impressed with the quality of work there.

_______________________________

Cheers, Tom

 

 

 

 

 

Photography by Tom Lane

Link to post
Share on other sites

>> Sander

 

 

With a bit more patience I managed to "open" your panoramas of NZ now.

Incredible photos, esp. I liked no. 6, the forest, and nos. 13 and 14, the flowers and the lake near by.

 

Great work, very impressive.

 

 

 

Best regards

 

GEORG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...