Jon Schick Posted January 18, 2010 Share #61 Posted January 18, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Given that one of the most important aspects is the lenses you use it with, and given that I'm pretty sure that Leica did offer an R to 4/3 converter when the D3 came out, I think there are ways of making sure that what you get out of the camera is going to be pretty "Leica-like", and the handling is certainly more traditional (and nothing wrong with that, if it ain't broke why fix it?) than any other digital SLR. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 18, 2010 Posted January 18, 2010 Hi Jon Schick, Take a look here Is the Digilux-3 "Seen" as a Leica. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Panamera_S Posted January 20, 2010 Share #62 Posted January 20, 2010 Is the Boxster seen as a Porsche ? Absolutely it is a Porsche, even though it is NOT assembled in Germany. While my other two ( C2S and Panamera S ) is built in Germany. I believe samething can be said with a camera, Leica do have their own brand standard, I don't think the just putting their badge on something that doesn't worth their name. It may be made somewhere else, but it is still a Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Mitchum Posted January 21, 2010 Share #63 Posted January 21, 2010 Except in this case the Boxter would be built for Porsche by Toyota who at the same time would market their own version as a Lexus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdannn Posted January 24, 2010 Share #64 Posted January 24, 2010 Interesting to see the input about the d3. I enjoy the camera, and hey---we all know we are paying for the red dot. . I find the focus a tad soft. As a result of your comments I will up the sharpness a notch and try it out. I don't do much post processing at all. I come from the era of film cameras where I had to get the shot with the camera in the 70s and 80s. I really enjoy my Leicas. They mix the digital world with my SLR memories. I'm happy. I also have a d2, and that's quite a camera. The lens alone is worth the price of that camera. Cheers, Dan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted January 24, 2010 Share #65 Posted January 24, 2010 I strongly disagree with that statement. Panasonic has studied and adapted the Leica "heritage," and that study is reflected in many of the Lumix cameras--especially the ones that have been chosen for Leica badging. Are you sure about this? I don't see the similarities at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlosecpf Posted January 24, 2010 Share #66 Posted January 24, 2010 I find the focus a tad soft. As a result of your comments I will up the sharpness a notch and try it out. I don't do much post processing at all. I come from the era of film cameras where I had to get the shot with the camera in the 70s and 80s. I really enjoy my Leicas. They mix the digital world with my SLR memories. Drdannn, I use my Digilux 3 in 2 film modes only: Dynamic Color and Dynamic B&W. From my experience those two modes render tack-sharp jpegs, specially if the aperture is set to 5.6 on the kit lens. I strongly recommend you trying them out. I'm happy. I also have a d2, and that's quite a camera. The lens alone is worth the price of that camera. Cheers, Dan I also have a D2 and I just love it. I totally agree with you that lens is quite something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.