jdeed1 Posted March 19, 2010 Share #1 Posted March 19, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Just tried a new 24mm elmar with my M3. I noted that on mounting the lens the 50mm and 135mm framelines show in the viewfinder just as when no lens is mounted. I checked that the lens was properly mounted which it was and re-mounted several times to be sure.Each time both framelines were shown. I then mounted a 21mm super angulon 3.4 ( I'm deciding which lens to buy !) and as I had expected only the 50mm framelines showed. Any members able to explain why the elmar shows up 2 framelines - the camera seems to recognise it as a 135mm lens! Incidentaly I'm leaning towards the super angulon. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Hi jdeed1, Take a look here M3 with elmar 24mm 3.8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
earleygallery Posted March 19, 2010 Share #2 Posted March 19, 2010 The 50mm frames are 'fixed' so yes the lens is triggering the 135mm frames. Does it matter? You need a 24mm viewfinder surely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan-S Posted March 19, 2010 Share #3 Posted March 19, 2010 Yes,24mm lenses bring up the 24/35/135 frames. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeed1 Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share #4 Posted March 19, 2010 James thanks for the reply. Yes I am using a separate viewfinder for composition but found it strange that the super angulon only triggers the 50mm frameline leaving a nice uncluttered viewfinder for focusing whereas the modern lens triggers the 135mm frameline inside the 50 mm. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jc_braconi Posted March 19, 2010 Share #5 Posted March 19, 2010 The M3 has a different caming device in the bayonet mount for actioning the 3 different frames in the viewfinder than the M4 P and following models with 6 frames. The 21 is contemporary of the M3, the 24 is younger and it is neutral in the M3 bayonet mount. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeed1 Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share #6 Posted March 19, 2010 J C ,thanks for the explanation. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted March 22, 2010 Share #7 Posted March 22, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) The SA has really bad vignetting to around F16. I sold mine for this reason. Check out before you buy. The upside is distortion ( curving of straight lines) is very small. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeed1 Posted March 22, 2010 Author Share #8 Posted March 22, 2010 The SA has really bad vignetting to around F16. I sold mine for this reason. Check out before you buy. The upside is distortion ( curving of straight lines) is very small . After a weekend with both lenses my initial view has changed. Whilst the super angulon was small and handled well I felt its colour rendition was somewhat 'cold' and there was some light falloff at the edges. The Elmar was quite simply stunning in every way. That is the lens I am buying. John Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.