MarkM6 Posted December 15, 2006 Share #21 Posted December 15, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Mark... I know what you mean. I play golf, but we don't sit around talking about what clubs we use. What matters is who gets it in the hole the quickest. Although, I admit to using the best equipment I can. Maybe if I spent less on golf, I could spend more on photography. No way! Only in the game of golf where you can be totally hopeless at it and still have a great time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Hi MarkM6, Take a look here Poor Man's M8 . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest stnami Posted December 15, 2006 Share #22 Posted December 15, 2006 No way! Only in the game of golf where you can be totally hopeless at it and still have a lousy time The lack of wide primes( 2x all lenses) is the problem with oly, along with the sensor stagnated at 400iso in real quality terms. Colour rendition superb and probably the best straight out of the box results of any system Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwalker649 Posted December 16, 2006 Share #23 Posted December 16, 2006 It's not outdated because there's nothing like it out there except for the much more expensive M8.. Cheers, Sean Sean, Are you aware of any other high quality digital RF cameras that could be a M8 option in the near future? Options that could use the M glass. I recently subscribed to your web site and enjoy reading your reviews. Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pelikan1931 Posted December 16, 2006 Share #24 Posted December 16, 2006 this is poor man's M8 with poor man's noctilux Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.