telewatt Posted January 3, 2010 Share #21 Posted January 3, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thanks!...looks fine... Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 3, 2010 Posted January 3, 2010 Hi telewatt, Take a look here A final bout of 'warm' S2 ISO tests. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest guy_mancuso Posted January 3, 2010 Share #22 Posted January 3, 2010 Tim show the crops where the color checker is with the wood and the shadow from the wood. Working ya bud Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elansprint72 Posted January 3, 2010 Share #23 Posted January 3, 2010 I don't suppose that you have a Nikon D700 lying around to include in the comparison? If you do, perhaps you could extend the ISO range? The Nikon runs up to ISO 25600, but it would be silly to include such a cheap camera in this test, would it not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tashley Posted January 3, 2010 Author Share #24 Posted January 3, 2010 I don't suppose that you have a Nikon D700 lying around to include in the comparison?If you do, perhaps you could extend the ISO range? The Nikon runs up to ISO 25600, but it would be silly to include such a cheap camera in this test, would it not? No, I don't have one, sorry, though I am sure that such a comparison would be instructive! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tashley Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share #25 Posted January 4, 2010 Tim show the crops where the color checker is with the wood and the shadow from the wood. Working ya bud I'm here to be worked! I only took a Passport shot at ISO 160 as my base reference so I'm not sure it'll tell you what you want but here it is, plus some crops from 'where the Passport was before I took it away' at other ISOs... 160: ___________ 320 ___________ 640: -------------------- 1250: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest s.m.e.p. Posted January 4, 2010 Share #26 Posted January 4, 2010 I have a LOT of cookery books. I test every recipe...:D:D Which cookbook would you recommend if I want to buy only one? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tashley Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share #27 Posted January 4, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Which cookbook would you recommend if I want to buy only one? Hmmm... If you're allowed another in a few weeks but want to start with one I'd focus on gaining one skill to perfection, so Rose Levy Berebaum's Bread Bible. Then I'd move on to Delia's Complete How to Cook or Nigella's How to Eat. Actually the best recipe book I ever had was a Sainsbury own brand one with basic recipes for lots of standard dishes, but they were all really good. Mmmm, French Onion Tart... must have French Onion Tart. I lent that to someone and they never returned it. Like my power drill, a really favourite sweater, my snorkel and a girl I was engaged to once... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted January 4, 2010 Share #28 Posted January 4, 2010 Always a mistake to lend out your snorkel... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barjohn Posted January 4, 2010 Share #29 Posted January 4, 2010 The low ISO noise is clearly visible in the spline of the purple book. In the prior test with daylight it is very smooth at low ISO but in the tungsten test it is not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tashley Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share #30 Posted January 4, 2010 The low ISO noise is clearly visible in the spline of the purple book. In the prior test with daylight it is very smooth at low ISO but in the tungsten test it is not. Yup, that's right, I guess because the blue constituent of the purple is very thin on the ground in tungsten light. I'm still reasonably impressed, personally, I must say. I thought these tungsten tests were going to yield noisier results at every ISO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogopix Posted January 5, 2010 Share #31 Posted January 5, 2010 The low ISO noise is clearly visible in the spline of the purple book. In the prior test with daylight it is very smooth at low ISO but in the tungsten test it is not. Maybe...maybe not. The position between the two series is different and some of what MIGHT be noise is too big a feature, more likely some changes due to the fact that aperture/speed changes. However, that siad, the Kodak chips have had blue channel noise since the pro-back. Maybe the way they are made. Overall, I doubt that at 160 the 'noise' would really effect IQ that much. On the other hand, at 1250 the noise seems a lot better than what I get from a P65+ at 800 (NOT binned.) I have to agree with Tim-looks pretty good overall. Victor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.