Nicoleica Posted December 15, 2009 Share #21 Posted December 15, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) This may be a daft question, and my apologies if it is, but have you got the latest firmware in your M8? This may make a difference if you are running on an early version. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Hi Nicoleica, Take a look here Magenta Sides with 21mm's on M8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pklein Posted December 16, 2009 Share #22 Posted December 16, 2009 I know this is going to sound a little crazy, but hear me out. Magenta corners means that the camera is over-correcting for the cyan corners that a wide-angle lens will generate on the M8 if the camera doesn't compensate. So, if the camera is over-correcting, what will reduce the correction? Code the lens as a shorter focal length. Try coding it as one of the 24 or 28mm lenses and see if that helps. Another possibility: What frame lines does the Zeiss lens bring up, and what frame lines would the Leica lens it's coded as bring up? Don't those have to match in order for coding to work properly? There is no "correct" M8 frame line for a 21mm lens. But if Zeiss and Leica didn't make the same choice, then the camera might not be seeing the right set of conditions, and as the good old programmer's disclaimer goes, "unpredictable results may occur." --Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 16, 2009 Share #23 Posted December 16, 2009 Thanks to all for the well-considered opinions. For clarification sake my ZM21 is fitted with a Leica brand UV/IR filter (13418) Menu setting was,and still is, set to "Lens Detection On + UV/IR" Thinking I had found the Holy Grail late last night in another thread, here: Leica M Lens Codes I recoded my ZM21 as an Elmarit 21 asph, this morning but unfortunately found the results pretty much on par as when the lens was coded as the non-asph version of the 21. I guess it is just something I'm going to have to live with (or not) and resolve to build a generic action to deal with it in post. Not the end of the world, by any stretch, given the real problems out there but disappointing nonetheless especially since I had based a lot of this decision to buy into the M8 three years 'late' on a series of tests that I had done about a year ago with my dealers demo M8 and his non asph 21 which has absolutely ZERO magenta/red cast. Looking at these clean files in front of me now is a cruel taunt :>)) Thanks again to all. Best, Mark Mark Tomalty Photography Montreal Canada Travel Landscape Stock FineArt P.S.-Got your tongue-in-cheek intent, Gregory. Thx Another stupid question: is the lens recognized in EXIF? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtomalty Posted December 17, 2009 Author Share #24 Posted December 17, 2009 Yes. The lens is recognized in the EXIF. Thx jaap Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 17, 2009 Share #25 Posted December 17, 2009 I went through my Biogon shots and did not see the problem there, but I must confess there were no real high-IR situations. I must chase the thing up and try this out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisemann Posted December 19, 2009 Share #26 Posted December 19, 2009 The mount on the Zeiss 21 must be adapted or changed to bring up the 28mm M8 Frameline. The UVIR filter and coding is not enough. Alternatively, you can select the 90/28 Framelines with the frameliine selector at the same tine that you activate the shutter. This is a bit of a finger exercise but will suffice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.