Jump to content

35/2 Summicron v4 vs. Voigtlander 35/2.5 on M8


pklein

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Has anyone compared the "pre-aspheric" 35 Summicron, version 4 with a good sample of the Voigtlander 35/2.5? I'd be interested in both comments and pictures.

 

I have the 35 'Cron. It's my daylight "normal" lens. Usually I love it, but sometimes it gets veiling flare with even moderate backlight.

 

--Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

the 35/2 'cron the my M8's body cap and its never flared on me. I usually shot wide open in bright conditions, love 1/8000th on the M8!

 

Do you have a hood for the lens?

 

I don't think there would be much comparison here, I love Voigtlander lenses, but the 35/2 'cron (4th) is the king of bokeh, and I think it would be unfair to compare it against the Voightlander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used 2 Voigtlander 35/2.5 pancake lens, none is them is a good example, maybe bad luck or something, CV's quality control is a main issue, both have strong soft corner or edges, one of them is nearly unusable. Don't reckon the Summicron is in the same league of CV lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both lenses. The Voightlander is a tad sharper and has more contrast but I actually like the rendition of the Summicron v4 better. The Summicron has that famous Leica glow where the CV merely outstanding. That glow will run you an extra $1,000. If you want a merely outstanding 35, I could part with my mint copy for say... $250 (with box and shade). PM me if you are interested.

 

The first shot is the CV 35 the second is the 35 Cron v4.

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...