Jump to content

"Desert Island" lenses?


brt3

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Sorry to ask something so silly -- but I am a newbie, after all... ;)

 

I also realize that we all have different styles, favorite subjects, lighting preferences, etc.. I recognize the gear has less to do with the image than the person behind the lens, but I'm also new to the Red Dot, am getting my first Leica (an M9), and am looking for advice on lens purchases. Even after selling the bulk of my Nikon gear, this will be a substantial purchase!

 

However, I will blame my question on the superb sites of people like Maurizio and Bixi. Specifically, after visiting their sites and viewing their work I am both inspired and blown away -- GREAT stuff!

 

So, kindly excuse me for asking -- but could you share your list of favorite lenses? Assume, for example, that you are going on a special trip and can only take 3 lenses along. Also assume that these have to be relatively modern lenses that are fairly easy to obtain. Lastly, I don't think I want to go wider than 28mm or longer than 90mm.

 

And thanks (in advance) for any advice!

 

Ray

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Careful you don't get sand in the lenses! :D

 

But on a more serious note - firstly, there have been endless threads on this sort of topic - a search might have helped you.

 

Frankly for the M9, I am not sure you actually need 3 lenses, but for 3 - 28/2.8, 50/2, 90/2.5 or if you want to splash out 28/2, 50/1.4, 90/2. YMMV

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I could have only one lens for a stay on a desert island (with power outlets, and SD cards growing on trees) it would be one of the standard lenses. And to me, 'standard' means 35 or 50mm, for both lengths are equally close to the traditional 'diagonal of format' length, which in this case is 43mm.

 

The old man from the Age of 10.5cm on 6x9

Link to post
Share on other sites

New M8.2 user (M9 upgrade next year) here and I went for the following lens:

 

Summarit 35mm f2.5

Summarit 90mm f2.5

Voigtlander 15m f4.5 + 21mm View finder (hand coded to Elmarit 21mm f2.8)

 

In order of use:

35mm used 60%

15mm 30%

90mm 10%

 

Love'm all....... Will keep them for the M9 that I purchase one day....... .

 

The Dirty Church (15mm in action)....

4025179651_67d9888a00_b.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

So, kindly excuse me for asking -- but could you share your list of favorite lenses? Assume, for example, that you are going on a special trip and can only take 3 lenses along. Also assume that these have to be relatively modern lenses that are fairly easy to obtain. Lastly, I don't think I want to go wider than 28mm or longer than 90mm.

 

And thanks (in advance) for any advice!

 

Ray

 

Hi Ray,

 

IMO

 

One lens kit : 50/1,4 Asph.

 

Two lenses : 35/2 Asph and 75/2 Apo

 

Three lenses for city trip: 28/2,8 Asph, 50/1,4 and Macro-Elmar 90/4

 

Three lenses for special trip: 28/2 Asph, 50/1,4 and 90/2 Apo

;)

 

Another solution for travel and dusty places is a second-hand Tri-Elmar 2d version 28/35/50 f4 + M-E 90/4 (+ 50/1,4).

 

The 28/2,8 Asph and the 35/50/75/90 Summarit are excellent and offer great value.

 

Best,

 

Lucien

 

P.S.

 

A great accessory IMO is the Double Lens Mount Cap from OP/TECH USA (Stock # 1101231).

 

It is much safer than the Leica version (discontinued) with wide-angle lenses.

 

Lens Mount Cap | Demo Page

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ray,

 

One lens kit: 50 lux asph or if you want small, inexpensive and beautiful second hand 50 Elmar 2.8

 

Two lens kit; 35 cron asph and 75 cron apo asph: (as beautiful IMO as the 50 lux)

 

Three lens kit; super elmar18, 35 cron asph, 75 cron asph

 

Four lens: I would add the Elmar 50 2.8

 

All the best,

Jean-Luc

Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it would be:

28 Summicron Asph

35 Summilux Asph

50 Summilux Pre-Asph

 

It seems like a tight grouping but it works for me. When I travel I may also take my 21 Elmarit Asph and 90 Summicron AA.

 

For someone who wants a more well-rounded kit I'd probably suggest:

28 Summicron Asph

50 Summilux

90 Summicron AA

 

Three lenses is a lot for a Leica M. You may want to just start with one or two and see how you do. Often I'll work with only one lens (usually a 35) or with two (usually a 28 + 50 combo).

 

But if I were stuck on a deserted island, I'd take a Nikkor 600/4 so I could search for help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends. Does the desert island have people? If so, the 28/2. If not, the 50/1.4.

 

It's all about what focal lengths you use an like the most. Don't succumb to the thinking that you need 4, 5, 6 lenses. 90% of your photos will probably be taken with one lens, 9% with a 2nd, and the other 1% from all your others combined. Maybe, maybe, it will be 60/39/1 :D

 

I'm of the 28/50/90 school. I can see where the 21/35/75 school is coming from too. Unless you shoot a ton of 90, skip the 90/2 and go for the 90/2.8 or 90/2.5 - it's a lot smaller and more compact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, this question is as old as the hills... :rolleyes:

 

One lens - 50mm Elmar-M

Two lenses - 35mm CV 2.5 Pancake, 90mm Elmarit-M

Three lenses - 35, 50, 90 (the original "holy trinity")

Four lenses - add a CV 15mm for town, a 135 3.4 APO for country

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly appreciate the quality and quantity of input from this group! I'm sorry to have beaten a dead horse (figuratively speaking), but I want to be somewhat targeted here and I have no desire (or the funding) to run out and buy 5 or 6 lenses. It is great to hear the different thoughts and perspectives on this; thanks for your tolerance and hand-holding...

 

Starting from a completely blank slate, I would likely choose the 50/1.4 as lens number one. That seems to be a no-brainer. Lens number two would, I think, be a 35/2, and lens three the 75/2. I really like what I'm hearing about this combination, and I think it would match my needs. At present I am not doing a lot of street photography; were that the case I'd probably go a little wider (28) than the 35.

 

One thing adds a bit of a twist to all of this. I have a Konica Hexar RF Ltd. with the Hexanon 50/1.2 lens. There's not a lot of info about how well this lens works with the M9. However, each and every time someone compares Zeiss lenses (to use one example) with their Leica "equivalents", I usually prefer the look of the all-Leica images.

 

So -- I need to decide whether to sell the Hexar RF kit and put that money towards the Leica 50/1.4 lens. That would certainly be simpler in some ways, as it would take advantage of the 6-bit coding and adjustments the camera makes to deal with lens variations. That one fact seems to stack the deck a bit, whereas that wouldn't be an issue with a film camera.

 

Of course, I can just use the Hex and see how well it plays with the M9. Regardless of which path I take with the 50, I think I clearly need to get the 35 and 75. I can always buy those two lenses, use the heck out of the M9, and decide whether to keep the Hex or upgrade to the Leica 50/1.4...

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is one of the things I thought about when I moved to the Leica (M9) system. I am a big fan of two and three lens kits. I already had an idea of the lenses I wanted so here is my final picks.

 

28 2.8 ASPH

50 1.4 ASPH

90 2.0 Cron (Canada)

 

The 28 and 90 are my main two lens kit and the 50 1.4 was added for low light and sometimes a one lens venture. Maybe I will get something wider like the Zeiss 18 but that will be down the road. Anyway, you said only three lenses but what about if you added a second body like the M8-2, you would be able to use your three lenses as different focal lengths making a six lens kit...

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if you don't want to go wider than 28 I think it's fairly straightforwards

 

If you aren't too hard up:

 

28 summicron f2

50 summilux f1.4

90 summarit f2.5 (or secondhand elmarit f2.8 - even better)

the reason not to have the 90 'cron is really to do with size. You want an M9 because it's small (right).

 

if you are a bit hard up:

 

28 elmarit f2.8

50 summarit f2.5

90 summarit f2.8

 

I think the summarits are great - small and reasonably priced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

However, I will blame my question on the superb sites of people like Maurizio and Bixi. Specifically, after visiting their sites and viewing their work I am both inspired and blown away -- GREAT stuff!

 

Dear Ray,

 

I hardly change lenses on my M9. The Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4 is my favorite. Having the option opening aperture up to 1.4 makes all the difference for me. I use it a lot.

 

Ray - thank you for commenting on my website in such a positive way. This is very kind of you :):):) And I agree with you, Maurizio has an inspiring website full of great photographs.

 

Best,

Bixi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...