JHAG Posted November 1, 2009 Share #21 Posted November 1, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Developed those DNG files with C1v4:YouSendIt - Send large files - transfer delivery - FTP Replacement Hardly see any artefact. Am i missing something? You're not. Someone here certainly is. Technically, files are impressive indeed (level of detail, micro-contrast, resolution, tadda-tadda). Uninteresting pictures though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 Hi JHAG, Take a look here S2 images from final version of the camera. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rotomax Posted November 2, 2009 Share #22 Posted November 2, 2009 Developed those DNG files with C1v4:YouSendIt - Send large files - transfer delivery - FTP Replacement Hardly see any artefact. Am i missing something? Hallo, danke für den Link. Die Bildqualität hinsichtlich Auflösung, Schärfe und Farbe ist absolut überragend ! Das ist ja Scanback Liga ! (geht nur nicht so gut mit Models). Hammer !!! Wer auf den Japanischen Seiten der Hersteller nach "Samples" sucht findet dort auch ähnliche Motive. Das sagt mehr als div. Test usw. und Detailabbildungen in Zeitschriften. Wann gibts eine farbige Ausleuchtkorrektur für den Reprobereich ? ;-) Ich wünsche Leica, gleich viele Bestellungen wie zur M9 ! Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu dem neuen Produkt! Jürgen Seidel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulmoore Posted November 10, 2009 Share #23 Posted November 10, 2009 .Uninteresting pictures though. they were not put in the gallery section, were they? but thanks for pointing out the obvious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHAG Posted November 10, 2009 Share #24 Posted November 10, 2009 they were not put in the gallery section, were they? but thanks for pointing out the obvious. Paul, May I offer you one of your cookies ? Please have a seat and a cup of tea and relax. PAUL MOORE STUDIO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrishayton Posted November 10, 2009 Share #25 Posted November 10, 2009 Not quite sure how you could label these as junk from a technical point of view, the resolution is outstanding and sure they are average shots artisically but Id say shes been used as she has plenty of micro hairs and strong side lighting to emphasise this. Id love to see some full size landscape shots though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHAG Posted November 10, 2009 Share #26 Posted November 10, 2009 Not quite sure how you could label these as junk from a technical point of view, the resolution is outstanding […] Technically, files are impressive indeed (level of detail, micro-contrast, resolution, tadda-tadda). As I wrote… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulmoore Posted November 10, 2009 Share #27 Posted November 10, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Paul, May I offer you one of your cookies ? Please have a seat and a cup of tea and relax. PAUL MOORE STUDIO I am very relaxed, seated and need neither tea or cookies. not sure what that has to do with your stating the obvious, or the need to put my link in this post..maybe due to the cultural gap here that I don't get it..but it is not a big deal one way or the other..I did not take offense to your comments about the s2 model shots, since I have no attachment to the shots posted, I merely picked up the camera and pressed the shutter, again, obviously not shots of any interest beyond the technical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHAG Posted November 10, 2009 Share #28 Posted November 10, 2009 …beyond the technical. The technical being outstanding, as said. The "obvious" being sometimes useful. Sorry if you took offence. Instead of tea, have some Clos-Vougeot 1947, then. PS : the link was to the cookies page, but did not survive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.