cbretteville Posted November 25, 2006 Share #1 Posted November 25, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) As far as I can make out from Schneider's available litterarure the 486 filter is not available as an 'MRC' (multi coated) filter. I've never used anything but MRC filters from B+W on my M glass as I beleive it deserves the best. Does anyone know if these are 'plain glass' filters? And does any other manifacturers have MC IR Cut filters? Cheers, - Carl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 25, 2006 Posted November 25, 2006 Hi cbretteville, Take a look here B+W IR cut 486 filter quality??. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jlancasterd Posted November 25, 2006 Share #2 Posted November 25, 2006 As far as I can make out from Schneider's available litterarure the 486 filter is not available as an 'MRC' (multi coated) filter. I've never used anything but MRC filters from B+W on my M glass as I beleive it deserves the best. Does anyone know if these are 'plain glass' filters? And does any other manifacturers have MC IR Cut filters?Cheers, - Carl Carl My reading of the data sheet in the B+W catalogue also indicates that their 486 filters are uncoated. It may be that it isn't possible to coat an IR-cut filter - after all, the IR absorbing layer is itself a coating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted November 25, 2006 Share #3 Posted November 25, 2006 I don't believe that the 486 are IR absorbing. The 489 filters are, but the 486 are of the type which trap certain wavelengths of light between two layers inside the filter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ho_co Posted November 25, 2006 Share #4 Posted November 25, 2006 You're right, Carsten. 489 is IR-absorbing, 486 is IR-cut by means of interference. But John is right in his assessment: The 486 does use multi-coating in order to produce its IR interference. Normally, multicoating is used to ease light from air into the glass and thereby reduce reflections. But the IR-cut design actually traps certain wavelengths completely. They enter but then can't get out because of repeated reflection. I'm no optician, but I would guess the two are mutually exclusive. And according to Edmund Optics - Mounted IR Filters, both surfaces do have a standard anti-reflection coating. (I bought one of the Edmund UV/IR-cut filters, and all signs are that it is made by B+W and is identical to the 486, as I've posted a couple times before.) Frankly, I wouldn't worry about the B+W filter quality. Look at how many of us are using it already. On the other hand, there has been a certain amount of disappointment with Tiffen's similar 'hot mirror' filter. --HC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.