Jump to content

Lightroom 3 Beta released


Recommended Posts

That thought crossed my mind as well - not exactly regarding a profile, I think that might become available still in LR 2.6 or so, but for the general upgrade path. Some late adopters might get lucky and get the 3 version of Lightroom, or does it state "comes with Lightroom 2"?

 

Dirk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some nice features IMO:

The new "import" procedure (that used to be a hassle),

The guesstimate aperture used with every single shot,

The GREAT new noise reduction, it works like a charm to me.

The preview speed (improved).

 

Hopefully a new M9 profile is coming, now simply it isn't there. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give it time - it seems that they released the beta in a fairly early state (they mention it a couple of times through the videos) to gain feedback from the users on the features. I reckon that the "engine" specific work is done separate from the feature related work.

 

Dirk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some late adopters might get lucky and get the 3 version of Lightroom, or does it state "comes with Lightroom 2"?

 

Dirk

 

I think it will come with whatever LR version is available at the time, because once LR3 is out, LR2 will no longer be availbable -- but the M9 hopefully will still be sold;).

 

When the M8 was shipped with C1, it actually included one upgrade to a new version (which I used to upgrade from 3.x to 4.x). Not sure whether that's also the case for the M9.

 

In any event, for those who do not yet own a copy of LR, the smart thing would be to use LR3 beta and then use to the free LR to get LR3 when it is released.

 

For those who already own LR2, use it until LR3 comes out and then use the free LR.

 

I think you could also sell your LR that comes with the M9.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any event, for those who do not yet own a copy of LR, the smart thing would be to use LR3 beta and then use to the free LR to get LR3 when it is released.

 

Not really that smart. The release notes say that catalogues from the beta may not be compatible with the release version of the software - which is understandable since it's a beta and the internal structure of the catalogue may change between now and the final release.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some nice features IMO:

The new "import" procedure (that used to be a hassle),

The guesstimate aperture used with every single shot,

The GREAT new noise reduction, it works like a charm to me.

The preview speed (improved).

 

Hopefully a new M9 profile is coming, now simply it isn't there. :(

Mauribix, yes it is in there and then is available from LR2 as well:)

Possibly we may also get a Camera Standard' profile later as well (simulating camera default jpg settings). I've always found the Adobe Standard ones more useful though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandy, sorry for my ignorance about that, but what's the difference?

 

Maurizio, as it turns out, I was slightly incorrect - the LR3 beta value is wrong, but not because its reading the wrong tag, it's wrong because LR3 is reading what is an tag encoded as an EV value as an f stop. So, e.g., if the tag value is 6.5 LR3 is showing the f stop as 6.5. But actually, the 6.5 is a EV value, so the f stop is actually 2^(6.5/2), or 9.2.

 

I've communicated this to Adobe - hopefully it will be fixed in a subsequent version.

 

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please clarify this to me?:confused:

I had to use Sandy's and make one on my own.:(

If you install the LR3 beta or copy the profile from the installation package to the default location the new profile 'Adobe Standard' is available via the Calibration menu.

LR will only show you the profiles that match your vcamera model. If you are developing an M9 DNG it is offering you Adobe Standard FOR AN M9.

If you are developing an M8 DNG then it will offer you the option of Adobe standard FOR AN M8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maurizio, as it turns out, I was slightly incorrect - the LR3 beta value is wrong, but not because its reading the wrong tag, it's wrong because LR3 is reading what is an tag encoded as an EV value as an f stop. So, e.g., if the tag value is 6.5 LR3 is showing the f stop as 6.5. But actually, the 6.5 is a EV value, so the f stop is actually 2^(6.5/2), or 9.2.

 

I've communicated this to Adobe - hopefully it will be fixed in a subsequent version.

 

Sandy

Hi Sandy I am certainly not reading any code the way you are. However as a practical matter I imported a sample of 100 M8 and M9 files with LR3 today to test this and compared the displayed value with my recalled actual aperture (shots from last couple of days). Anecdotally they are within 0.5~ 1.5 stops of actual aperture. Example: known exposed at f/2 reported as 2.5 consistently and f/4 as 2.5~5. I can provide recorded shutter speeds if you want to demolish my impressions with the math ;-)

That may be due to limited shutter speed variation ont hese not adversely skewing the EV value???? My ancient analog brain is not processing your equation however.

Edited by hoppyman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sandy I am certainly not reading any code the way you are. However as a practical matter I imported a sample of 100 M8 and M9 files with LR3 today to test this and compared the displayed value with my recalled actual aperture (shots from last couple of days). Anecdotally they are within 0.5~ 1.5 stops of actual aperture. Example: known exposed at f/2 reported as 2.5 consistently and f/4 as 2.5~5. I can provide recorded shutter speeds if you want to demolish my impressions with the math ;-)

That may be due to limited shutter speed variation ont hese not adversely skewing the EV value???? My ancient analog brain is not processing your equation however.

 

Geoff,

 

Its going to be close to the right value most of the time. On the example I provided to Adobe, it was:

 

Actual Aperture as shot: f/8

Leica Estimated Aperture from the MakerNotes: f/9.5

 

LR displayed aperture: f/6.5

 

CornerFix's estimate was f/8, btw.

 

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...