Jump to content

M9? I'm waiting and ready!


scjohn

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have read all of the M9 posts forever without comment. For whatever reason, I feel like commenting now.

 

I would LOVE full frame. Be honest? Who wouldn't. I fell in love with film bodies and invested in my lens as a film body user. I bought my 21 2.8 used before the M8 came out because I knew I would need it for the crop based on how I use my camera and the prices had not yet jumped. But I learned to enjoy the 21 mm perspective on my m7 while I waited for the m8 "official announcement."

 

When the m8 came out, I missed the width the 21 gave me on the m7. I bought a CV 15 to "tide me over."

 

I bought the "old" Nocti with my "sorry for the problems with the m8 launch" rebate.

 

I longed for the new 21 1.4 and 24 1.4 but $6k??? (To get what I have with my 35 1.4, 50 1.4 and 50 1.0 already if only I can get full frame? No deal!

 

I will buy a full frame m9 in a second. If it even approaches the D3's low noise characteristics i will throw my flash off the roof and may throw my D3 off as well.

 

My 21, 35, 50, and 90 is all I need in full frame. Low noise is all I need for the natural light work I do forever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I learned to love the M8, and got used to the crop factor - maybe because I have no comparison, as I do not own a film M. I do have a 5D, which I loved before I had the M8, and the High Iso performance is something I miss on the M8.

Provided the sensitivity of the sensor is somewhere close to the 5d (I'd love to see a usable 3200, or even 6400) I would buy one. Full frame and extra MP would seal the deal.

 

Not sure though if I would sell the M8, I guess I more likely would sell the 5d then.

 

But at present - Pie in the sky (albeit so close, we can nearly smell it!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if they went the Nikon D3 route with a FF sensor - large chunky pixels to give low noise but lowish resolution which requires a heavy duty AA filter to keep the aliasing at bay. Not the Leica way.

 

More likely IMHO would be a sensor with resolution scaled on the existing pixel pitch with noise improvements brought by improved technology - sensor, A/D conversion, firmware processing, in other words, a D3x, not a D3.

 

I expect there will be plenty of bitching about the price here too. I'm steeling myself for £4990, €5990, $7495 (+ tax), say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More likely IMHO would be a sensor with resolution scaled on the existing pixel pitch with noise improvements brought by improved technology - sensor, A/D conversion, firmware processing, in other words, a D3x, not a D3.

 

I'd go for that. Though let's not specify prices too often in the forum in case there's a chance that it lands up being cheaper :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...