Jump to content

Brian Bower LEICA M8/8.2 book - now shipping in UK


enty

Recommended Posts

I've had this book a couple of months. IMHO it is very poor. I voiced my opinion before in another thread so I won't do so again in detail but I would urge - try before you buy or you may be disappointed. I didn't and I was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

About the Boowu-M (16526), Brian Bower makes a mistake in describing it at pages 128-129. It is not so that the frame sizes are reduced by the tele-effect of the M8, as showed in the table at page 128, but the distance to the object should be extended. In other words, to use the Boowu-M correctly, one has to extend the legs with about a third! In this way I've made excellent A-4 copies with an old Elmar 3.5/50mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Boowu-M (16526), Brian Bower makes a mistake in describing it at pages 128-129. It is not so that the frame sizes are reduced by the tele-effect of the M8, as showed in the table at page 128, but the distance to the object should be extended. In other words, to use the Boowu-M correctly, one has to extend the legs with about a third! In this way I've made excellent A-4 copies with an old Elmar 3.5/50mm.

 

I can understand making longer legs or extending the existing ones - but how did you get the focus right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
I can understand making longer legs or extending the existing ones - but how did you get the focus right?

 

Dear Giordano,

 

I've bought four alu-tubes, length 40.4 cm and diameter 12 mm (outside) and 8 mm (inside). They fit on the original legs till the extension-screw. See the two pictures. For A4 the distance for focus is OK, for A4 I have to put the object on a book of about 6 cm high.

Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Boowu-M (16526), Brian Bower makes a mistake in describing it at pages 128-129. It is not so that the frame sizes are reduced by the tele-effect of the M8, as showed in the table at page 128, but the distance to the object should be extended. In other words, to use the Boowu-M correctly, one has to extend the legs with about a third! In this way I've made excellent A-4 copies with an old Elmar 3.5/50mm.

 

I have to make half a correction. Recently I bought an Elmar 2.8/50mm collapsable. And I was very surprised to find out tat Bower was right bnow and that I had not to make any extension of the Boowy-legs.

 

So at the happy end I have another problem, a mystery for me: why this difference between the Elmar 3.5/50mm and the Elmar 2.8/50mm? For what reason does the first one needs an extension of the Boowy-legs and the second one not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...