Jump to content

Tri X @ 400. ID-11 or Microphen?


antistatic

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As soon as I begin to get used to Tri X in Tmax developer, both shops in my town are out of Tmax developer and can only shrug their collective shoulders when I ask when it might be in stock.

 

The only developers available are ID-11 and Microphen. What developer would you choose for Tri X @ 400. I don't mind some grain but want highlights and shadows preserved.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ID-11 is the Ilford equivalent of Kodak D76 (metol-hydroquinone developer).

TRI-X and D76/ID11 @ 400 ISO is a very good combination which gives excellent tone values. This combi. has been used by many well known photographers.

See http://wwwbefr.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/f4017/f4017.pdf which gives you the starting times for D76 and TRI-X. These times might be slightly different for ID11.

see -> http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/200621612182416.pdf

If you shoot TRI-X at 1600 or 3200 ISO, Microphen might be the better choice.

 

 

Good luck,

 

Serge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...